Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

The 84th Notre Dame-USC Game Looms Large

  • The undefeated Fighting Irish, winners over #7 Stanford and #10 Oklahoma, move to #1
  • As the nation's only other undefeated team, Ohio State climbs to #2
  • 1-loss Florida — whose tally of 3 wins versus the current top-25 (over #11 LSU, #15 South Carolina, and #16 Texas A&M) is matched only by Notre Dame's and Stanford's — remains #3
  • Stanford's dramatic win at Oregon lands the Cardinal at #7 — as the nation's top 2-loss team
  • #19 Florida State has played only 1 game versus the current top-50 (beating #14 Clemson in Tallahassee) and has 1 loss (to #66 N.C. State)
  • The Big 12 reclaims the top spot in the conference rankings, as the SEC's non-conference strength-of-schedule rating drops by .031
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 18

Nov. 11 Rankings
Nov. 4 Rankings
Oct. 28 Rankings
Oct. 21 Rankings
Oct. 14 Rankings
Oct. 7 Rankings
Oct. 3 Rankings

Final 2011-12 Rankings
Final '11 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Notre Dame
.833
11
0
.555
29
2-0
1-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.812
11
0
.519
50
0-0
1-0
0
3.
Florida
.802
10
1
.581
15
0-1
3-0
0
4.
Kansas State
.786
10
1
.556
28
1-0
1-0
1
5.
Georgia
.782
10
1
.550
31
1-0
0-1
0
6.
Alabama
.781
10
1
.550
32
0-0
2-1
0
7.
Stanford
.774
9
2
.606
3
2-1
1-0
1
8.
Oregon
.765
10
1
.527
48
0-1
1-0
0
9.
Oregon State
.755
8
2
.592
11
0-1
2-0
1
10.
Oklahoma
.754
8
2
.590
12
0-2
1-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. LSU
.748
9
2
.570
21
  Big 12
.622
26
4
.390
12. Nebraska
.747
9
2
.570
23
  Southeastern
.616
44
8
.398
13. Texas
.739
8
2
.571
20
  Pac-12
.598
24
10
.473
14. Clemson
.733
10
1
.484
62
  Big Ten
.581
34
14
.454
15. South Carolina
.728
9
2
.545
37
  Big East
.507
25
14
.422
16. Texas A&M
.725
9
2
.541
41
  Atlantic Coast
.495
27
17
.427
17. UCLA
.710
9
2
.523
49
  Sun Belt
.438
17
23
.482
18. Oklahoma State
.706
7
3
.595
9
  Mid-American
.437
26
26
.437
19. Florida State
.705
10
1
.449
87
  WAC
.432
22
19
.410
20. Michigan
.698
8
3
.568
24
  Mountain West
.395
17
24
.445
21. Rutgers
.691
9
1
.440
98
  Conference USA
.371
12
36
.523
22. Arizona
.680
7
4
.604
5
  *non-conference play
23. Northwestern
.675
8
3
.542
38
 
24. Louisville
.674
9
1
.421
107
 
25. Kent State
.667
10
1
.406
111
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Washington
.664
7
4
.586
13
 
76.
Western Kentucky
.466
6
5
.439
100
27.
Northern Illinois
.650
10
1
.388
121
 
77.
East Carolina
.464
7
4
.384
122
28.
Texas Tech
.650
7
4
.572
19
 
78.
Indiana
.452
4
7
.534
43
29.
Mississippi State
.650
8
3
.514
54
 
79.
California
.444
3
9
.597
8
30.
USC
.649
7
4
.570
22
 
80.
Auburn
.436
3
8
.575
17
31.
San Jose State
.644
9
2
.447
91
 
81.
Virginia
.434
4
7
.516
51
32.
Utah State
.632
9
2
.435
102
 
82.
UTSA
.430
7
4
.352
124
33.
Penn State
.628
7
4
.548
34
 
83.
Central Michigan
.425
5
6
.452
84
34.
Vanderbilt
.628
7
4
.548
35
 
84.
Pittsburgh
.425
4
6
.484
61
35.
Iowa State
.627
6
5
.602
6
 
85.
Air Force
.424
6
5
.398
118
36.
Ball State
.625
8
3
.487
59
 
86.
Temple
.420
4
6
.480
65
37.
Wisconsin
.621
7
4
.541
40
 
87.
Troy
.420
5
6
.447
92
38.
Louisiana Tech
.612
9
2
.413
109
 
88.
South Florida
.413
3
7
.534
44
39.
TCU
.609
6
4
.550
30
 
89.
Kentucky
.410
2
9
.609
2
40.
Tulsa
.602
9
2
.404
114
 
90.
North Texas
.399
4
7
.480
64
41.
Toledo
.602
8
3
.464
81
 
91.
Connecticut
.397
4
6
.455
83
42.
Boise State
.601
9
2
.403
116
 
92.
Buffalo
.388
4
7
.469
75
43.
West Virginia
.595
5
5
.595
10
 
93.
Maryland
.386
4
7
.467
78
44.
Cincinnati
.594
7
3
.472
72
 
94.
Rice
.386
5
6
.412
110
45.
Arkansas State
.585
8
3
.446
93
 
95.
Miami, Ohio
.385
4
7
.466
80
46.
Michigan State
.579
5
6
.605
4
 
96.
SMU
.378
5
6
.404
115
47.
Baylor
.573
5
5
.573
18
 
97.
Marshall
.375
5
6
.401
117
48.
Missouri
.573
5
6
.599
7
 
98.
Houston
.361
4
7
.440
99
49.
Fresno State
.572
8
3
.433
103
 
99.
Texas State
.358
3
7
.477
67
50.
San Diego State
.568
8
3
.429
105
 
100.
Kansas
.358
1
10
.621
1
51.
Miami, Fla.
.560
6
5
.533
45
 
101.
Wyoming
.358
4
7
.437
101
52.
Syracuse
.560
6
5
.533
46
 
102.
Western Michigan
.352
4
8
.449
86
53.
Navy
.557
7
4
.475
69
 
103.
Illinois
.351
2
9
.548
36
54.
North Carolina
.548
7
4
.466
79
 
104.
Boston College
.345
2
9
.541
39
55.
Central Florida
.545
8
3
.406
112
 
105.
Florida Atlantic
.340
3
8
.474
70
56.
Arizona State
.542
6
5
.515
52
 
106.
Washington State
.337
2
9
.533
47
57.
Mississippi
.537
5
6
.564
26
 
107.
New Mexico
.336
4
8
.432
104
58.
Minnesota
.536
6
5
.509
56
 
108.
Fla. International
.325
3
8
.458
82
59.
BYU
.530
6
5
.503
57
 
109.
UTEP
.315
3
8
.446
95
60.
LA Monroe
.530
7
4
.447
90
 
110.
Colorado State
.313
3
8
.444
96
61.
LA Lafayette
.529
6
4
.469
74
 
111.
Colorado
.309
1
10
.567
25
62.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.517
7
3
.396
119
 
112.
Army
.300
2
9
.490
58
63.
Ohio
.517
8
3
.379
123
 
113.
UAB
.292
3
8
.419
108
64.
Georgia Tech
.514
6
5
.487
60
 
114.
Eastern Michigan
.291
2
9
.478
66
65.
Purdue
.510
5
6
.537
42
 
115.
Memphis
.280
3
8
.405
113
66.
N.C. State
.509
6
5
.482
63
 
116.
Tulane
.267
2
9
.448
88
67.
Bowling Green
.507
7
4
.425
106
 
117.
South Alabama
.265
2
9
.446
94
68.
Duke
.499
6
5
.472
73
 
118.
UNLV
.261
2
10
.451
85
69.
Arkansas
.499
4
7
.581
14
 
119.
Idaho
.237
1
10
.477
68
70.
Tennessee
.495
4
7
.577
16
 
120.
Hawaii
.235
1
9
.467
77
71.
Virginia Tech
.487
5
6
.515
53
 
121.
Massachusetts
.234
1
10
.473
71
72.
Wake Forest
.482
5
6
.510
55
 
122.
New Mexico State
.218
1
9
.443
97
73.
Utah
.482
4
7
.564
27
 
123.
Akron
.217
1
10
.448
89
74.
Nevada
.472
7
4
.391
120
 
124.
Southern Miss
.180
0
11
.468
76
75.
Iowa
.467
4
7
.549
33
               

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2012 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved