Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

Kansas St. and Notre Dame Are Essentially Tied

  • #1 Kansas State edges #2 Notre Dame by .00004
  • Florida — the only team in the country with a winning record against the current top-10 — is #3
  • #4 Oregon is 0-0 versus the current top-20, but the Ducks will now play #11 Stanford and #12 Oregon State the next two weeks
  • The current top-10 teams are 9-9 against each other and a combined 82-0 versus the rest of the field
  • Amazingly, 6 of the top 10 teams — including the entire second-5 (#6-10) — are from the SEC
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 11

Nov. 4 Rankings
Oct. 28 Rankings
Oct. 21 Rankings
Oct. 14 Rankings
Oct. 7 Rankings
Oct. 3 Rankings

Final 2011-12 Rankings
Final '11 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Kansas State
.834
10
0
.557
31
0-0
3-0
0
2.
Notre Dame
.834
10
0
.557
32
0-0
3-0
0
3.
Florida
.817
9
1
.611
7
3-1
0-0
0
4.
Oregon
.809
10
0
.515
50
0-0
3-0
0
5.
Ohio State
.809
10
0
.514
52
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Alabama
.803
9
1
.588
16
1-1
1-0
0
7.
Georgia
.792
9
1
.572
22
1-1
0-0
0
8.
LSU
.760
8
2
.599
10
2-2
1-0
0
9.
South Carolina
.758
8
2
.596
11
1-2
0-0
0
10.
Texas A&M
.756
8
2
.593
12
1-2
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Stanford
.755
8
2
.591
14
  Southeastern
.642
37
7
.429
12. Oregon State
.750
7
2
.600
9
  Big 12
.622
26
4
.390
13. Nebraska
.736
8
2
.568
24
  Pac-12
.599
24
10
.474
14. Oklahoma
.735
7
2
.581
19
  Big Ten
.582
34
14
.456
15. Texas
.733
8
2
.564
25
  Big East
.501
23
13
.417
16. Clemson
.721
9
1
.476
73
  Atlantic Coast
.490
26
16
.418
17. Florida State
.701
9
1
.451
88
  Sun Belt
.439
17
23
.484
18. Michigan
.692
7
3
.579
20
  Mid-American
.439
26
26
.439
19. UCLA
.692
8
2
.514
53
  WAC
.430
21
18
.407
20. Oklahoma State
.682
6
3
.589
15
  Mountain West
.400
17
24
.450
21. Texas Tech
.677
7
3
.563
26
  Conference USA
.371
12
36
.523
22. USC
.675
7
3
.560
28
  *non-conference play
23. Washington
.671
6
4
.616
2
 
24. Arizona
.671
6
4
.616
3
 
25. Louisville
.671
9
1
.418
109
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Rutgers
.665
8
1
.419
107
 
76.
Indiana
.464
4
6
.524
47
27.
Louisiana Tech
.657
9
1
.402
117
 
77.
East Carolina
.462
6
4
.403
116
28.
Kent State
.654
9
1
.399
119
 
78.
Nevada
.459
6
4
.400
118
29.
Northwestern
.651
7
3
.533
43
 
79.
Virginia
.452
4
6
.512
54
30.
Mississippi State
.640
7
3
.522
48
 
80.
California
.446
3
8
.585
18
31.
Wisconsin
.633
7
3
.514
51
 
81.
Troy
.440
5
5
.440
97
32.
Toledo
.631
8
2
.445
92
 
82.
Auburn
.426
2
8
.612
6
33.
Northern Illinois
.628
9
1
.372
122
 
83.
North Texas
.423
4
6
.483
64
34.
Vanderbilt
.620
6
4
.562
27
 
84.
Pittsburgh
.421
4
6
.481
67
35.
San Jose State
.619
8
2
.433
101
 
85.
South Florida
.419
3
6
.519
49
36.
Cincinnati
.618
7
2
.447
91
 
86.
Miami, Ohio
.418
4
6
.478
72
37.
Iowa State
.615
5
5
.615
4
 
87.
UTSA
.416
6
4
.359
123
38.
Penn State
.614
6
4
.556
33
 
88.
Air Force
.410
5
5
.410
112
39.
Missouri
.613
5
5
.613
5
 
89.
SMU
.408
5
5
.408
113
40.
TCU
.612
6
4
.554
34
 
90.
Kentucky
.401
1
9
.656
1
41.
Boise State
.609
8
2
.422
105
 
91.
Connecticut
.398
4
6
.457
83
42.
Utah State
.608
8
2
.422
106
 
92.
Central Michigan
.397
4
6
.456
84
43.
West Virginia
.604
5
4
.572
23
 
93.
Temple
.395
3
6
.495
57
44.
Ball State
.604
7
3
.483
66
 
94.
Houston
.394
4
6
.453
86
45.
Michigan State
.593
5
5
.593
13
 
95.
Maryland
.386
4
6
.445
93
46.
Tulsa
.581
8
2
.395
120
 
96.
Western Michigan
.381
4
7
.461
80
47.
Central Florida
.578
8
2
.392
121
 
97.
Buffalo
.377
3
7
.497
55
48.
Fresno State
.572
8
3
.433
102
 
98.
Florida Atlantic
.376
3
7
.495
56
49.
Arkansas State
.569
7
3
.447
90
 
99.
Texas State
.375
3
6
.473
75
50.
San Diego State
.569
8
3
.430
103
 
100.
Illinois
.372
2
8
.558
30
51.
Mississippi
.550
5
5
.550
36
 
101.
Rice
.358
4
6
.416
110
52.
BYU
.547
6
4
.486
61
 
102.
New Mexico
.356
4
7
.435
100
53.
Minnesota
.546
6
4
.486
62
 
103.
Boston College
.353
2
8
.537
41
54.
Navy
.544
6
4
.484
63
 
104.
Kansas
.351
1
9
.607
8
55.
Miami, Fla.
.544
5
5
.544
39
 
105.
Washington State
.351
2
8
.535
42
56.
Arizona State
.543
5
5
.543
40
 
106.
Marshall
.350
4
6
.407
114
57.
Ohio
.541
8
2
.357
124
 
107.
Wyoming
.336
3
7
.452
87
58.
Bowling Green
.534
7
3
.412
111
 
108.
UAB
.324
3
7
.439
98
59.
Syracuse
.526
5
5
.526
44
 
109.
Colorado State
.313
3
7
.427
104
60.
Tennessee
.526
4
6
.586
17
 
110.
Colorado
.308
1
9
.559
29
61.
North Carolina
.523
6
4
.463
78
 
111.
Army
.304
2
8
.481
68
62.
Duke
.521
6
4
.461
79
 
112.
UTEP
.301
2
8
.478
71
63.
N.C. State
.518
6
4
.458
82
 
113.
Fla. International
.296
2
8
.472
76
64.
Arkansas
.515
4
6
.575
21
 
114.
UNLV
.276
2
9
.460
81
65.
Baylor
.515
4
5
.548
37
 
115.
South Alabama
.271
2
8
.441
95
66.
LA Monroe
.508
6
4
.447
89
 
116.
Tulane
.270
2
8
.441
96
67.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.507
6
3
.406
115
 
117.
Memphis
.253
2
8
.418
108
68.
LA Lafayette
.503
5
4
.470
77
 
118.
Eastern Michigan
.252
1
9
.490
58
69.
Western Kentucky
.496
6
4
.436
99
 
119.
Massachusetts
.250
1
9
.487
60
70.
Utah
.493
4
6
.553
35
 
120.
Hawaii
.247
1
8
.474
74
71.
Purdue
.487
4
6
.547
38
 
121.
Idaho
.247
1
9
.483
65
72.
Georgia Tech
.479
5
5
.479
69
 
122.
Akron
.220
1
10
.453
85
73.
Wake Forest
.479
5
5
.479
70
 
123.
New Mexico State
.219
1
9
.444
94
74.
Virginia Tech
.466
4
6
.526
45
 
124.
Southern Miss
.193
0
10
.489
59
75.
Iowa
.466
4
6
.526
46
               

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2012 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved