Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

Kansas State Moves to #1

  • #1 Kansas St. and #2 Florida — the only teams that have beaten anyone in the current top-10 (the Wildcats won on the road vs. #9 Oklahoma; the Gators won at home vs. #8 LSU) — have accomplished the most to date and therefore have earned the top two spots
  • #3 Oregon St. (6-0 with a win at #22 Arizona), #4 Notre Dame (7-0 with wins at home vs. #12 Stanford and #25 Michigan), and #5 Alabama (7-0 with a win vs. #25 Michigan on a neutral field) round out the current top-5
  • Collectively, the current top-10 is a perfect 12-0 versus the rest of the current top-25 — and is 54-0 versus teams ranked outside of the current top-25
  • 12 of the teams in the current top-15 are from either the SEC (6), Big 12 (3), or Pac-12 (3)
  • The Big 12, a gaudy 26-3 in non-conference play, leads all conferences with 8 teams in the current top-40 (despite having only 10 teams) and — top-to-bottom — has been the top conference to date
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 21

Oct. 14 Rankings
Oct. 7 Rankings
Oct. 3 Rankings

Final 2011-12 Rankings
Final '11 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Kansas State
.848
7
0
.583
11
1-0
1-0
0
2.
Florida
.842
7
0
.571
16
1-0
2-0
0
3.
Oregon State
.830
6
0
.549
27
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Notre Dame
.827
7
0
.545
29
0-0
2-0
0
5.
Alabama
.811
7
0
.518
42
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Oregon
.800
7
0
.500
54
0-0
1-0
0
7.
Ohio State
.794
8
0
.491
60
0-0
0-0
0
8.
LSU
.765
7
1
.552
24
0-1
2-0
0
9.
Oklahoma
.758
5
1
.574
14
0-1
2-0
0
10.
Mississippi State
.758
7
0
.439
98
0-0
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Texas Tech
.757
6
1
.555
22
  Big 12
.648
26
3
.395
12. Stanford
.756
5
2
.647
2
  Southeastern
.635
32
7
.436
13. Rutgers
.746
7
0
.423
104
  Pac-12
.588
24
10
.463
14. Georgia
.733
6
1
.523
38
  Big Ten
.582
34
14
.455
15. South Carolina
.729
6
2
.591
9
  Big East
.516
22
11
.415
16. Louisville
.718
7
0
.389
119
  Atlantic Coast
.492
26
14
.402
17. USC
.715
6
1
.501
53
  WAC
.451
20
16
.419
18. West Virginia
.701
5
2
.580
12
  Sun Belt
.445
16
20
.478
19. Texas
.688
5
2
.565
18
  Mid-American
.424
24
25
.430
20. Ohio
.676
7
0
.343
123
  Mountain West
.406
17
23
.450
21. Texas A&M
.676
5
2
.552
25
  Conference USA
.380
12
34
.525
22. Arizona
.674
4
3
.635
3
  *non-conference play
23. Florida State
.674
7
1
.439
99
 
24. Boise State
.673
6
1
.451
90
 
25. Michigan
.669
5
2
.544
31
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Clemson
.665
6
1
.443
97
 
76.
Maryland
.475
4
3
.433
101
27.
Penn State
.665
5
2
.539
32
 
77.
New Mexico
.471
4
4
.471
74
28.
Wisconsin
.660
6
2
.511
46
 
78.
East Carolina
.471
5
3
.397
117
29.
Toledo
.655
7
1
.419
107
 
79.
Syracuse
.467
3
4
.510
47
30.
Nebraska
.651
5
2
.524
36
 
80.
North Texas
.451
3
4
.494
56
31.
Iowa State
.642
4
3
.601
6
 
81.
Utah
.445
2
5
.575
13
32.
UCLA
.641
5
2
.513
44
 
82.
Texas State
.444
3
3
.444
95
33.
Louisiana Tech
.638
6
1
.414
110
 
83.
Air Force
.439
4
3
.397
116
34.
Tulsa
.637
7
1
.400
115
 
84.
UTSA
.437
5
2
.315
124
35.
Northwestern
.633
6
2
.481
66
 
85.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.436
4
3
.394
118
36.
Oklahoma State
.623
4
2
.524
37
 
86.
Kentucky
.430
1
7
.665
1
37.
TCU
.621
5
2
.492
58
 
87.
Marshall
.423
3
4
.465
78
38.
Cincinnati
.613
5
1
.404
112
 
88.
South Florida
.419
2
5
.549
26
39.
Northern Illinois
.613
7
1
.375
121
 
89.
Miami, Ohio
.417
3
4
.459
84
40.
Western Kentucky
.609
5
2
.480
67
 
90.
Houston
.415
3
4
.457
86
41.
Arizona State
.609
5
2
.480
68
 
91.
Illinois
.414
2
5
.544
30
42.
N.C. State
.608
5
2
.478
69
 
92.
SMU
.414
3
4
.456
88
43.
San Jose State
.592
5
2
.461
82
 
93.
Connecticut
.409
3
5
.484
64
44.
Kent State
.587
6
1
.362
122
 
94.
Pittsburgh
.404
3
4
.446
92
45.
LA Monroe
.587
5
2
.456
87
 
95.
Georgia Tech
.403
3
4
.445
94
46.
Washington
.577
3
4
.618
4
 
96.
Central Michigan
.397
2
5
.527
35
47.
Utah State
.573
6
2
.420
105
 
97.
Auburn
.393
1
6
.618
5
48.
Michigan State
.571
4
4
.571
15
 
98.
Indiana
.374
2
5
.503
51
49.
Iowa
.565
4
3
.523
39
 
99.
Washington State
.373
2
5
.502
52
50.
Duke
.556
6
2
.403
114
 
100.
Western Michigan
.366
3
5
.439
100
51.
Tennessee
.554
3
4
.596
7
 
101.
Virginia
.365
2
6
.517
43
52.
Mississippi
.553
4
3
.511
45
 
102.
UTEP
.344
2
6
.493
57
53.
Vanderbilt
.552
3
4
.594
8
 
103.
Kansas
.340
1
6
.563
20
54.
Navy
.550
4
3
.507
49
 
104.
South Alabama
.339
2
5
.464
79
55.
Miami, Fla.
.549
4
4
.549
28
 
105.
Rice
.316
2
6
.462
81
56.
North Carolina
.547
5
3
.472
72
 
106.
Tulane
.303
1
6
.521
40
57.
Missouri
.546
3
4
.588
10
 
107.
UAB
.303
1
6
.521
41
58.
Central Florida
.545
5
2
.415
109
 
108.
Florida Atlantic
.292
1
6
.508
48
59.
Ball State
.539
5
3
.463
80
 
109.
Hawaii
.287
1
5
.484
63
60.
Baylor
.538
3
3
.538
33
 
110.
Buffalo
.282
1
6
.496
55
61.
Nevada
.534
6
2
.382
120
 
111.
Boston College
.272
1
6
.483
65
62.
BYU
.529
4
4
.529
34
 
112.
Fla. International
.268
1
7
.491
59
63.
Arkansas
.527
3
4
.570
17
 
113.
Wyoming
.262
1
6
.470
75
64.
Fresno State
.518
5
3
.443
96
 
114.
Colorado
.260
1
6
.467
76
65.
Minnesota
.517
4
3
.474
71
 
115.
Eastern Michigan
.259
1
6
.467
77
66.
Purdue
.510
3
4
.553
23
 
116.
UNLV
.256
1
7
.475
70
67.
Troy
.504
4
3
.461
83
 
117.
Akron
.253
1
7
.472
73
68.
Temple
.503
3
3
.503
50
 
118.
Southern Miss
.243
0
7
.562
21
69.
LA Lafayette
.503
4
2
.403
113
 
119.
Colorado State
.243
1
6
.445
93
70.
Bowling Green
.503
5
3
.428
103
 
120.
Idaho
.236
1
7
.450
91
71.
Wake Forest
.501
4
3
.458
85
 
121.
Memphis
.231
1
6
.429
102
72.
Arkansas State
.495
4
3
.453
89
 
122.
New Mexico State
.224
1
6
.419
106
73.
Virginia Tech
.489
4
4
.489
61
 
123.
Army
.221
1
6
.415
108
74.
California
.489
3
5
.564
19
 
124.
Massachusetts
.191
0
7
.486
62
75.
San Diego State
.486
5
3
.411
111
               

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2012 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved