Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

The Cowboys and Tigers Remain #1-2

  • Through the first 11 weeks of the season, Oklahoma St. and LSU are by far the two most accomplished teams
  • Both have gone undefeated versus schedules that (based on games played to date) are among the 15-toughest in the country
  • The next-most accomplished teams are #3 Alabama, #4 Oklahoma, and #5 Oregon
  • The 15-toughest schedules in the nation (to date) have all been played by Big 12 or SEC teams
  • Notre Dame (#24) and TCU (#25) crack the top-25
  • The BCS is a major reason why college football has the best regular season in all of sports, and this coming week will feature 4 more top-25 matchups: #4 Oklahoma at #21 Baylor; #17 USC at #5 Oregon; #7 Kansas St. at #16 Texas; #18 Nebraska at #15 Michigan
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 13

Nov. 6 Rankings
Oct. 30 Rankings
Oct. 23 Rankings
Oct. 16 Rankings
Oct. 9 Rankings
Oct. 2 Rankings

Final 2010-11 Rankings
Final '10 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Oklahoma State
.853
10
0
.591
11
1-0
2-0
0
2.
LSU
.846
10
0
.579
15
2-0
1-0
0
3.
Alabama
.800
9
1
.584
14
1-1
1-0
0
4.
Oklahoma
.795
8
1
.586
13
1-0
1-0
1
5.
Oregon
.782
9
1
.558
22
1-1
0-0
0
6.
Arkansas
.774
9
1
.546
29
1-1
1-0
0
7.
Kansas State
.755
8
2
.592
10
0-2
1-0
0
8.
South Carolina
.753
8
2
.590
12
0-1
1-1
0
9.
Virginia Tech
.750
9
1
.513
50
0-0
0-1
0
10.
Stanford
.748
9
1
.511
54
0-1
1-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Boise State
.735
8
1
.502
60
  Big 12
.702
27
3
.453
12. Clemson
.734
9
1
.492
67
  Southeastern
.633
35
5
.395
13. Houston
.733
10
0
.407
113
  Big Ten
.557
35
13
.417
14. Georgia
.728
8
2
.558
23
  Pac-12
.541
21
12
.459
15. Michigan
.719
8
2
.547
28
  Big East
.533
26
13
.432
16. Texas
.714
6
3
.624
4
  Atlantic Coast
.532
29
13
.416
17. USC
.706
8
2
.531
39
  Conference USA
.464
21
26
.496
18. Nebraska
.704
8
2
.528
40
  Mountain West
.460
21
18
.437
19. Southern Miss
.699
9
1
.449
89
  Mid-American
.417
21
30
.470
20. Penn State
.696
8
2
.518
45
  Sun Belt
.409
11
23
.515
21. Baylor
.694
6
3
.602
7
  WAC
.390
13
25
.484
22. Michigan State
.690
8
2
.511
51
  *non-conference play
23. Auburn
.674
6
4
.619
5
 
24. Notre Dame
.671
7
3
.556
24
 
25. TCU
.667
8
2
.485
70
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Texas A&M
.658
5
5
.658
1
 
74.
Eastern Michigan
.467
6
4
.408
112
27.
Wisconsin
.646
8
2
.462
80
 
75.
Fla. International
.466
6
4
.407
114
28.
Tulsa
.642
7
3
.523
43
 
76.
Air Force
.463
5
5
.463
79
29.
Georgia Tech
.630
7
3
.511
53
 
77.
Kansas
.458
2
8
.643
2
30.
Missouri
.630
5
5
.630
3
 
78.
Western Michigan
.458
5
5
.458
85
31.
West Virginia
.618
7
3
.497
62
 
79.
Navy
.456
4
6
.516
48
32.
Florida State
.617
7
3
.496
63
 
80.
East Carolina
.456
4
6
.516
49
33.
Cincinnati
.616
7
2
.445
92
 
81.
Temple
.451
6
4
.392
119
34.
Florida
.608
5
5
.608
6
 
82.
UTEP
.447
5
5
.447
91
35.
Arkansas State
.605
8
2
.419
109
 
83.
Connecticut
.445
4
5
.479
72
36.
North Carolina
.601
6
4
.542
32
 
84.
Western Kentucky
.441
5
5
.441
94
37.
Texas Tech
.599
5
5
.599
8
 
85.
Rice
.439
3
7
.560
21
38.
Iowa State
.598
5
4
.566
19
 
86.
Washington State
.432
4
6
.492
66
39.
Rutgers
.596
7
3
.475
75
 
87.
North Texas
.431
4
6
.491
68
40.
Washington
.591
6
4
.532
37
 
88.
Utah State
.398
4
5
.431
103
41.
Illinois
.584
6
4
.525
42
 
89.
Hawaii
.393
5
5
.393
118
42.
Virginia
.580
7
3
.458
83
 
90.
Duke
.391
3
7
.511
52
43.
Ohio State
.580
6
4
.520
44
 
91.
Mississippi
.389
2
8
.575
16
44.
Arizona State
.576
6
4
.516
46
 
92.
Kent State
.389
4
6
.447
90
45.
Vanderbilt
.566
5
5
.566
18
 
93.
Boston College
.386
3
7
.507
57
46.
Iowa
.566
6
4
.506
58
 
94.
Central Florida
.383
4
6
.441
93
47.
Mississippi State
.562
5
5
.562
20
 
95.
Arizona
.381
2
8
.567
17
48.
Nevada
.559
6
3
.458
84
 
96.
Minnesota
.370
2
8
.555
25
49.
BYU
.556
7
3
.434
100
 
97.
Maryland
.368
2
8
.553
27
50.
Utah
.556
6
4
.496
64
 
98.
Bowling Green
.366
4
6
.423
107
51.
Miami, Fla.
.555
5
5
.555
26
 
99.
New Mexico State
.365
4
6
.422
108
52.
LA Lafayette
.551
8
3
.412
111
 
100.
Miami, Ohio
.359
4
6
.417
110
53.
California
.547
6
4
.487
69
 
101.
Fresno State
.353
3
7
.471
76
54.
Wake Forest
.542
5
5
.542
33
 
102.
LA Monroe
.349
3
7
.467
77
55.
San Diego State
.538
6
3
.437
98
 
103.
Colorado
.347
2
9
.543
31
56.
Tennessee
.538
4
6
.597
9
 
104.
San Jose State
.342
3
7
.459
82
57.
South Florida
.534
5
4
.501
61
 
105.
Army
.337
3
7
.453
86
58.
UCLA
.533
5
5
.533
36
 
106.
Oregon State
.334
2
8
.516
47
59.
Wyoming
.533
6
3
.432
102
 
107.
Troy
.311
2
7
.475
74
60.
Purdue
.531
5
5
.531
38
 
108.
Colorado State
.311
3
6
.404
115
61.
SMU
.520
6
4
.460
81
 
109.
Central Michigan
.307
3
8
.437
97
62.
Northern Illinois
.519
7
3
.398
117
 
110.
Indiana
.291
1
9
.539
34
63.
Toledo
.513
6
4
.453
87
 
111.
UAB
.290
2
8
.465
78
64.
Northwestern
.509
5
5
.509
55
 
112.
UNLV
.290
2
7
.450
88
65.
Louisville
.509
5
5
.509
56
 
113.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.270
2
7
.426
105
66.
Pittsburgh
.504
5
5
.504
59
 
114.
Buffalo
.270
2
8
.440
95
67.
Ball State
.499
6
4
.439
96
 
115.
Idaho
.265
2
8
.434
101
68.
Syracuse
.496
5
5
.496
65
 
116.
Tulane
.251
2
9
.429
104
69.
Ohio
.495
7
3
.375
120
 
117.
New Mexico
.245
1
9
.480
71
70.
Louisiana Tech
.495
6
4
.435
99
 
118.
Memphis
.241
2
8
.403
116
71.
Marshall
.485
4
6
.545
30
 
119.
Florida Atlantic
.217
0
9
.527
41
72.
Kentucky
.476
4
6
.536
35
 
120.
Akron
.205
1
9
.424
106
73.
N.C. State
.476
5
5
.476
73
     

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2011 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved