Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

The Top 5 Separate Themselves from the Field

  • Through the first 9 weeks of the season, Oklahoma St., Alabama, LSU, Boise St., and Stanford have accomplished more than any other teams in the nation
  • Those 5 are the only remaining unbeaten teams that have at least one win vs. the current top-25
  • The Oklahoma Sooners are all by themselves at #6, with large gaps on either side
  • Half of the Big 12 and SEC teams are currently in the top-25, as well as a third of the Big Ten and Pac-12 teams
  • The BCS is a major reason why college football has the best regular season in all of sports, and this coming week will feature several more top-flight matchups: #3 LSU at #2 Alabama (#1 vs. #2 in the overall BCS Standings); #22 Texas A&M at #6 Oklahoma; #7 South Carolina at #10 Arkansas; #9 Kansas St. at #1 Oklahoma St.; and #16 Oregon at #27 Washington
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 30

Oct. 23 Rankings
Oct. 16 Rankings
Oct. 9 Rankings
Oct. 2 Rankings

Final 2010-11 Rankings
Final '10 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Oklahoma State
.852
8
0
.590
12
0-0
2-0
0
2.
Alabama
.834
8
0
.556
22
1-0
1-0
0
3.
LSU
.826
8
0
.542
30
0-0
2-0
0
4.
Boise State
.822
7
0
.536
32
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Stanford
.817
8
0
.527
36
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Oklahoma
.799
7
1
.601
7
1-0
1-0
1
7.
South Carolina
.775
7
1
.566
18
0-0
1-1
0
8.
Houston
.764
8
0
.447
94
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Kansas State
.763
7
1
.550
27
0-1
0-0
0
10.
Arkansas
.752
7
1
.535
33
0-1
2-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Michigan
.745
7
1
.525
37
  Big 12
.697
27
3
.447
12. Virginia Tech
.742
8
1
.512
48
  Southeastern
.645
31
4
.400
13. Nebraska
.734
7
1
.511
49
  Big Ten
.558
34
13
.422
14. Texas
.734
5
2
.620
4
  Pac-12
.555
21
12
.473
15. Penn State
.727
8
1
.492
65
  Atlantic Coast
.551
29
11
.414
16. Oregon
.722
7
1
.496
61
  Big East
.535
25
13
.440
17. Clemson
.722
8
1
.486
68
  Conference USA
.473
21
24
.493
18. Georgia
.722
6
2
.583
13
  Mountain West
.453
20
18
.438
19. USC
.707
6
2
.566
19
  Mid-American
.422
21
30
.474
20. Auburn
.692
6
3
.599
9
  Sun Belt
.413
11
20
.500
21. Southern Miss
.682
7
1
.449
90
  WAC
.391
12
23
.485
22. Texas A&M
.681
5
3
.612
5
  *non-conference play
23. Michigan State
.670
6
2
.523
39
 
24. Georgia Tech
.667
7
2
.500
57
 
25. Arizona State
.661
6
2
.513
46
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
North Carolina
.652
6
3
.556
23
 
74.
Northern Illinois
.473
5
3
.399
114
27.
Washington
.649
6
2
.498
58
 
75.
Kentucky
.462
3
5
.538
31
28.
Cincinnati
.646
6
1
.422
109
 
76.
Pittsburgh
.461
4
4
.461
85
29.
West Virginia
.637
6
2
.486
67
 
77.
Louisiana Tech
.451
4
4
.451
88
30.
Baylor
.633
4
3
.592
10
 
78.
Hawaii
.450
5
3
.377
119
31.
Ohio State
.628
5
3
.555
24
 
79.
Mississippi
.450
2
6
.603
6
32.
Notre Dame
.625
5
3
.552
25
 
80.
Air Force
.448
4
4
.448
92
33.
Tulsa
.624
5
3
.551
26
 
81.
Arizona
.446
2
6
.600
8
34.
Missouri
.621
4
4
.621
2
 
82.
Ohio
.444
5
3
.371
120
35.
Texas Tech
.621
5
3
.547
28
 
83.
UTEP
.441
4
4
.441
97
36.
Wisconsin
.617
6
2
.465
81
 
84.
Duke
.430
3
5
.505
54
37.
Illinois
.609
6
3
.509
52
 
85.
Rice
.422
2
6
.576
14
38.
Florida
.590
4
4
.590
11
 
86.
San Jose State
.420
3
5
.495
63
39.
TCU
.589
6
2
.436
100
 
87.
North Texas
.418
3
6
.519
41
40.
Arkansas State
.586
6
2
.432
103
 
88.
Northwestern
.411
3
5
.486
69
41.
Wake Forest
.585
5
3
.510
50
 
89.
Fresno State
.409
3
5
.484
72
42.
Syracuse
.580
5
3
.505
55
 
90.
Washington State
.407
3
5
.482
74
43.
Florida State
.580
5
3
.505
56
 
91.
Central Florida
.405
4
4
.405
113
44.
LA Lafayette
.578
7
2
.406
112
 
92.
Connecticut
.400
3
5
.475
79
45.
Miami, Fla.
.574
4
4
.574
15
 
93.
Bowling Green
.393
4
5
.425
107
46.
Mississippi State
.574
4
4
.574
16
 
94.
Western Kentucky
.385
4
4
.385
118
47.
Vanderbilt
.572
4
4
.572
17
 
95.
Maryland
.382
2
6
.534
34
48.
Toledo
.563
5
3
.488
66
 
96.
Miami, Ohio
.375
3
5
.448
91
49.
Iowa State
.561
4
4
.561
20
 
97.
Navy
.373
2
6
.525
38
50.
Nevada
.560
5
3
.485
70
 
98.
Minnesota
.366
2
6
.517
44
51.
SMU
.560
5
3
.485
71
 
99.
Troy
.364
2
5
.492
64
52.
Rutgers
.557
5
3
.482
73
 
100.
Central Michigan
.351
3
6
.448
93
53.
BYU
.552
6
3
.451
89
 
101.
Army
.350
3
5
.422
108
54.
Virginia
.551
5
3
.476
77
 
102.
Boston College
.348
2
6
.497
59
55.
Tennessee
.547
3
5
.620
3
 
103.
Oregon State
.347
2
6
.497
60
56.
UCLA
.545
4
4
.545
29
 
104.
Kent State
.345
2
6
.495
62
57.
Wyoming
.528
5
2
.398
116
 
105.
Colorado State
.329
3
5
.399
115
58.
Fla. International
.522
5
3
.446
95
 
106.
Utah State
.329
2
5
.453
87
59.
Louisville
.519
4
4
.519
42
 
107.
New Mexico State
.323
3
5
.392
117
60.
South Florida
.518
4
3
.476
78
 
108.
Colorado
.317
1
8
.561
21
61.
Eastern Michigan
.518
5
3
.443
96
 
109.
LA Monroe
.315
2
6
.461
83
62.
Purdue
.513
4
4
.513
45
 
110.
UNLV
.312
2
5
.435
101
63.
California
.512
4
4
.512
47
 
111.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.305
2
5
.426
106
64.
Iowa
.512
5
3
.436
99
 
112.
Indiana
.281
1
8
.518
43
65.
Utah
.510
4
4
.510
51
 
113.
Memphis
.275
2
7
.431
104
66.
East Carolina
.507
4
4
.507
53
 
114.
Buffalo
.271
2
7
.427
105
67.
San Diego State
.505
4
3
.462
82
 
115.
UAB
.260
1
7
.481
75
68.
Marshall
.495
4
5
.528
35
 
116.
Tulane
.259
2
7
.411
110
69.
Western Michigan
.492
5
4
.459
86
 
117.
Akron
.245
1
7
.461
84
70.
Kansas
.487
2
6
.638
1
 
118.
Idaho
.225
1
7
.433
102
71.
Temple
.484
5
3
.410
111
 
119.
Florida Atlantic
.214
0
7
.521
40
72.
N.C. State
.476
4
4
.476
76
 
120.
New Mexico
.182
0
8
.471
80
73.
Ball State
.474
5
4
.441
98
     

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2011 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved