The Only Original and Unaltered
BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most to Date

Essentially a 4-Way Tie for First!
  • Read the BCS Report: What Hopes Do Teams Have of Making the National Championship Game?
  • LSU is at .7713, Arizona State .7712, Kansas .7709, and Missouri .7707
  • Each of the top-4 has at least one top-25 foe left to play
  • Strengths and weaknesses of each team's claim: LSU has 3 wins vs. the current top-25 (by far the best among the top-4), but all 3 were at home, the Tigers clearly have the worst loss among the top-4 (at #28 Kentucky), and 40% of their wins have been vs. teams currently ranked below #75; Arizona State's loss was on the road to #8 Oregon, and the Sun Devils have 6 wins vs. #26-65 (tops among the top-4 and double LSU's tally), but they have 0 wins vs. the current top-25; Kansas is 11-0 and has 5 wins vs. teams currently ranked between #36-55, but the Jayhawks have 0 wins vs. the top-35; and Missouri's loss was on the road vs. #14 Oklahoma, but the Tigers have only 1 win vs. the current top-40 (vs. #17 Illinois).
  • Check out AndersonSports BCS commentary here
More College
Football Links
The Anderson & Hester College Football 
Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 18 
Nov. 11 Rankings
Nov. 4 Rankings
Oct. 28 Rankings
Oct. 21 Rankings
Oct. 14 Rankings
Final 2006-07 Rankings
Read the BCS Report: What Hopes Do Teams Have of Making the National Championship Game?


 

  Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength*
Sched. 
Rank*
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
LSU .771
10
1
.535 43 2-0 1-0 1
2.
Arizona State .771
9
1
.542 38 0-1 0-0 0
3.
Kansas .771
11
0
.457 81 0-0 0-0 0
4.
Missouri .771
10
1
.534 44 0-0 1-1 0
5.
Ohio State .765
11
1
.520 49 0-0 2-1 0
6.
West Virginia .758
9
1
.523 46 0-0 1-1 0
7.
Georgia .747
9
2
.570 18 1-0 1-1 1
8.
Oregon .738
8
2
.570 19 1-0 2-0 2
9.
Florida .715
8
3
.590 8 0-2 1-1 0
10.
Virginia Tech .715
9
2
.529 45 0-1 1-1 0
Rank Team  Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating W*  L* Sched.
Strength*
11. USC .714
8
2
.541 40   Pac-10 .628 21 8 .493
12. Boston College .706
9
2
.517 52   Southeastern .626 38 6 .396
13. Texas .702
9
2
.513 55   Big East .585 29 11 .447
14. Oklahoma .700
9
2
.511 59   Big 12 .572 36 11 .409
15. Virginia .695
9
2
.505 64   Atlantic Coast .571 31 13 .446
16. Tennessee .695
8
3
.565 23   Big Ten .555 35 9 .373
17. Illinois .694
9
3
.550 34   Mountain West .488 20 16 .454
18. Connecticut .676
9
2
.483 72   WAC .398 15 20 .440
19. South Florida .672
8
3
.539 42   Mid-American .379 17 41 .503
20. Wisconsin .662
9
3
.514 54   Conference USA .378 14 32 .495
21. Cincinnati .657
8
3
.522 47   Sun Belt .364 8 30 .542
22. Clemson .654
8
3
.519 50    
23. Auburn .651
7
4
.573 14  
24. Hawaii .650
10
0
.317 119  
25. Michigan .650
8
4
.553 31  
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team  Rating W L Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team  Rating W L Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26. BYU .649 8 2 .465 78   73. Bowling Green .473 7 4 .393 112
27. Oregon State .648 7 4 .570 20   74. Ball State .473 6 5 .446 85
28. Kentucky .644 7 4 .565 24   75. Florida Atlantic .465 5 5 .465 77
29. Penn State .643 8 4 .545 36   76. Miami, Ohio .463 6 5 .436 94
30. Boise State .636 10 1 .373 117   77. Pittsburgh .459 4 6 .519 51
31. Florida State .633 7 4 .553 30   78. Mississippi .455 3 8 .594 5
32. California .622 6 5 .596 4   79. Central Michigan .446 6 5 .419 99
33. Wake Forest .621 7 4 .541 39   80. San Diego State .442 4 6 .502 67
34. Utah .614 8 3 .477 74   81. Louisiana Tech .423 5 6 .450 84
35. South Carolina .607 6 5 .580 12   82. North Carolina .420 3 8 .559 26
36. Michigan State .606 7 5 .557 28   83. Southern Miss .416 6 5 .390 113
37. Air Force .599 9 3 .446 86   84. Nevada .412 5 5 .412 105
38. Mississippi State .597 6 5 .571 16   85. LA Monroe .411 5 6 .438 93
39. Alabama .595 6 5 .568 21   86. Iowa State .406 3 9 .559 25
40. Oklahoma State .593 6 5 .567 22   87. Notre Dame .395 2 9 .593 6
41. Arkansas .593 7 4 .512 56   88. Memphis .394 6 5 .369 118
42. UCLA .587 5 5 .587 10   89. Mid. Tenn. St. .387 5 6 .414 103
43. Georgia Tech .587 7 4 .505 63   90. Baylor .387 3 9 .540 41
44. Texas Tech .586 8 4 .486 69   91. Arkansas State .384 5 6 .410 106
45. Rutgers .584 7 4 .502 68   92. Toledo .383 5 6 .409 107
46. Nebraska .578 5 6 .605 2   93. Western Michigan .379 4 7 .460 80
47. Texas A&M .578 6 5 .551 33   94. Syracuse .378 2 9 .576 13
48. Central Florida .571 8 3 .432 95   95. Akron .371 4 7 .451 83
49. Purdue .564 7 5 .514 53   96. San Jose State .365 4 7 .444 87
50. Troy .562 7 3 .440 91   97. Buffalo .360 4 7 .439 92
51. Indiana .558 7 5 .508 60   98. Ohio .356 5 6 .381 116
52. Colorado .556 5 6 .582 11   99. Army .350 3 8 .485 70
53. Tulsa .551 8 3 .412 104   100. Temple .340 4 7 .417 101
54. Washington .546 4 7 .626 1   101. Eastern Michigan .331 4 8 .426 96
55. Vanderbilt .545 5 6 .572 15   102. Duke .330 1 10 .590 7
56. Arizona .543 5 6 .570 17   103. Tulane .325 4 7 .401 108
57. New Mexico .537 7 4 .455 82   104. UTEP .318 4 7 .394 111
58. Kansas State .532 5 6 .559 27   105. UNLV .316 2 9 .508 61
59. Maryland .525 5 6 .552 32   106. Colorado State .314 2 9 .505 62
60. N.C. State .519 5 6 .546 35   107. New Mexico State .308 4 8 .400 109
61. Louisville .517 5 6 .544 37   108. Kent State .297 3 8 .425 97
62. Northwestern .511 6 6 .511 57   109. LA Lafayette .295 3 8 .423 98
63. Iowa .511 6 6 .511 58   110. Minnesota .293 1 11 .555 29
64. TCU .510 6 5 .483 73   111. UAB .288 2 9 .475 75
65. Washington State .506 4 7 .588 9   112. Marshall .285 2 9 .471 76
66. Fresno State .501 6 4 .441 89   113. Rice .267 3 8 .389 115
67. Navy .496 7 4 .414 102   114. Utah State .243 1 10 .485 71
68. Miami, Fla. .493 5 6 .521 48   115. Northern Illinois .222 2 9 .390 114
69. East Carolina .489 6 5 .462 79   116. North Texas .218 1 9 .442 88
70. Houston .481 7 4 .400 110   117. Idaho .212 1 10 .441 90
71. Stanford .478 3 7 .599 3   118. Fla. International .202 0 10 .503 66
72. Wyoming .477 5 6 .505 65   119. SMU .197 1 10 .419 100

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2007 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved