The Only Original and Unaltered
BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most to Date

Closest Rankings Ever?
  • LSU, Oregon, and Kansas are separated by only .001, with Arizona St. within .005 of the top
  • No team is anywhere near .800, the usual entry-point for national championship consideration
  • No undefeated team has a win versus the current top-40 (although Kansas has 3 wins vs. the top-50), every 1-loss team aside from Arizona St. and Missouri has lost to a team currently ranked outside the top-10, only two 1-loss teams have a win versus the current top-10 (Oregon over #4 Arizona St. and #10 USC, Oklahoma over #5 Missouri), and no 1-loss team has a win versus the current top-20 on the road
  • Good matchup this coming weekend: #99 Duke (1-9 vs. the 3rd-toughest schedule) at #96 Notre Dame (1-9 vs. the 2nd-toughest schedule)
  • Read the BCS Report: What Hopes Do Teams Have of Making the National Championship Game?
  • Check out AndersonSports BCS commentary here
More College
Football Links
The Anderson & Hester College Football 
Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 11 
Nov. 4 Rankings
Oct. 28 Rankings
Oct. 21 Rankings
Oct. 14 Rankings
Final 2006-07 Rankings


 

    Rating
L
Sched.
Strength*
Sched. 
Rank*
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
LSU .780
9
1
.554 26 0-0 3-1 0
2.
Oregon .779
8
1
.562 22 2-0 1-0 1
3.
Kansas .779
10
0
.468 75 0-0 0-0 0
4.
Arizona State .775
9
1
.548 31 0-1 0-0 0
5.
Missouri .767
9
1
.537 42 0-1 1-0 0
6.
Ohio State .757
10
1
.516 51 0-0 2-1 0
7.
Oklahoma .748
9
1
.511 56 1-0 1-0 1
8.
Georgia .739
8
2
.571 17 0-0 2-1 1
9.
West Virginia .738
8
1
.506 60 0-0 0-0 1
10.
USC .715
8
2
.541 38 0-1 0-0 1
Rank Team  Rating W L Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating W*  L* Sched.
Strength*
11. Florida .714 7 3 .605 4   Southeastern .632 37 5 .390
12. Virginia .703 9 2 .514 54   Pac-10 .626 21 8 .491
13. Texas .701 9 2 .512 55   Big East .585 29 11 .448
14. Virginia Tech .696 8 2 .519 50   Atlantic Coast .583 31 12 .448
15. Illinois .685 8 3 .554 27   Big 12 .573 36 11 .409
16. Clemson .683 8 2 .504 62   Big Ten .565 35 8 .371
17. Tennessee .683 7 3 .569 18   Mountain West .484 19 16 .458
18. Cincinnati .681 8 2 .501 64   WAC .402 15 20 .444
19. Boston College .680 8 2 .500 65   Mid-American .375 16 40 .504
20. Connecticut .679 8 2 .499 66   Conference USA .371 13 32 .497
21. Penn State .675 8 3 .543 35   Sun Belt .345 7 29 .533
22. Michigan .670 8 3 .537 41            
23. Wisconsin .669 8 3 .536 43            
24. Kentucky .667 7 3 .551 28            
25. Auburn .656 7 4 .578 12            
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team  Rating W L Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team  Rating W L Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26. South Florida .655 7 3 .538 40   73. Stanford .475 3 7 .596 6
27. California .649 6 4 .592 7   74. Pittsburgh .473 4 5 .506 59
28. Boise State .644 9 1 .389 115   75. San Diego State .462 4 5 .495 69
29. Hawaii .643 9 0 .311 119   76. Florida Atlantic .458 5 4 .426 99
30. Alabama .641 6 4 .584 9   77. Mississippi .452 3 7 .574 15
31. Mississippi State .630 6 4 .572 16   78. Bowling Green .448 6 4 .389 114
32. Oregon State .624 6 4 .566 20   79. Ball State .444 5 5 .444 84
33. BYU .622 7 2 .451 80   80. Miami, Ohio .442 5 5 .442 87
34. Florida State .622 6 4 .564 21   81. North Carolina .438 3 7 .560 24
35. South Carolina .609 6 5 .583 10   82. Nevada .427 5 4 .395 111
36. Wake Forest .605 6 4 .547 33   83. Iowa State .410 3 8 .549 29
37. Purdue .602 7 4 .521 48   84. Toledo .405 5 5 .405 108
38. Utah .586 7 3 .465 77   85. Louisiana Tech .403 4 6 .463 78
39. Michigan State .582 6 5 .555 25   86. Southern Miss .397 5 5 .397 109
40. Air Force .576 8 3 .437 90   87. Baylor .397 3 8 .535 44
41. Georgia Tech .575 6 4 .516 52   88. San Jose State .389 4 6 .448 82
42. Oklahoma State .575 5 5 .575 13   89. Akron .384 4 6 .443 86
43. UCLA .574 5 5 .574 14   90. Mid. Tenn. St. .382 5 6 .408 107
44. Texas A&M .574 6 5 .547 32   91. Syracuse .380 2 8 .566 19
45. Nebraska .573 5 6 .600 5   92. Buffalo .379 4 6 .438 89
46. Central Florida .573 7 3 .451 81   93. Memphis .373 5 5 .373 118
47. Arkansas .569 6 4 .509 57   94. LA Monroe .359 4 6 .417 103
48. Rutgers .564 6 4 .504 61   95. Arkansas State .357 4 6 .414 106
49. Vanderbilt .562 5 5 .562 23   96. Notre Dame .357 1 9 .612 2
50. New Mexico .558 7 3 .436 92   97. Army .355 3 7 .473 73
51. Colorado .553 5 6 .580 11   98. Ohio .355 5 6 .381 117
52. Iowa .552 6 5 .525 47   99. Duke .350 1 9 .606 3
53. Troy .552 7 3 .430 97   100. New Mexico State .342 4 7 .420 101
54. Texas Tech .549 7 4 .467 76   101. UTEP .337 4 6 .392 112
55. N.C. State .541 5 5 .541 36   102. Western Michigan .332 3 7 .448 83
56. Maryland .541 5 5 .541 37   103. Kent State .323 3 7 .438 88
57. Kansas State .541 5 5 .541 39   104. Temple .317 3 7 .430 96
58. Tulsa .536 7 3 .415 105   105. UNLV .316 2 8 .496 68
59. Louisville .533 5 5 .533 46   106. Tulane .303 3 7 .415 104
60. Indiana .530 6 5 .502 63   107. UAB .303 2 8 .480 72
61. Washington State .525 4 6 .585 8   108. Eastern Michigan .295 3 8 .423 100
62. Northwestern .524 6 5 .496 67   109. Marshall .294 2 8 .470 74
63. Miami, Fla. .514 5 5 .514 53   110. Minnesota .290 1 10 .545 34
64. Fresno State .504 6 4 .444 85   111. Colorado State .288 1 9 .535 45
65. Washington .501 3 7 .621 1   112. Rice .282 3 7 .391 113
66. TCU .491 5 5 .491 70   113. LA Lafayette .268 2 8 .437 91
67. Central Michigan .491 6 4 .431 95   114. Northern Illinois .230 2 8 .388 116
68. East Carolina .489 6 5 .462 79   115. North Texas .219 1 8 .435 93
69. Arizona .489 4 6 .549 30   116. Fla. International .213 0 9 .521 49
70. Navy .487 6 4 .428 98   117. Idaho .211 1 9 .432 94
71. Wyoming .486 5 5 .486 71   118. Utah State .205 0 10 .507 58
72. Houston .478 6 4 .418 102   119. SMU .188 1 9 .397 110

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2007 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved