Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

The Top 5 Split from the Pack

Vindicating the BCS

Bowl Championship Splendor

Poll on Fans’ View of BCS Standings vs. the Committee

  • There is more than a 50-point gap between the top 5 teams and the rest of the field
  • #5 Washington is closer to #1 Alabama (.044 behind) than to #6 Western Michigan (.051 ahead)
  • Ohio State edges the Huskies for the #4 spot on the strength of having gone 8-1 versus the nations’s 3rd-toughest schedule
  • The SEC, Big Ten, Pac-12, and ACC—the top 4 conferences—each have at least 5 teams in the top-25
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 7

Oct. 31 Rankings
Oct. 24 Rankings
Oct. 17 Rankings
Oct. 10 Rankings

Final 2015-16 Rankings
Final ’15 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.851
9
0
.589
9
1-0
2-0
0
2.
Clemson
.843
9
0
.572
18
1-0
2-0
0
3.
Michigan
.829
9
0
.548
31
2-0
1-0
0
4.
Ohio State
.810
8
1
.608
3
1-1
2-0
0
5.
Washington
.807
9
0
.512
55
0-0
1-0
0
6.
W. Michigan
.756
9
0
.436
100
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Louisville
.755
8
1
.528
47
0-1
1-0
0
8.
Penn State
.753
7
2
.604
6
1-1
1-0
1
9.
Wisconsin
.745
7
2
.593
8
0-2
1-0
0
10.
Texas A&M
.738
7
2
.584
12
0-1
2-0
1

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Auburn
.737
7
2
.583
14
  Southeastern
.624
35
9
.442
12. Boise State
.733
8
1
.499
65
  Big Ten
.609
32
10
.448
13. Nebraska
.727
7
2
.571
19
  Pac-12
.594
24
10
.469
14. Colorado
.706
7
2
.546
32
  Atlantic Coast
.567
36
12
.413
15. Tennessee
.700
6
3
.609
2
  American Athletic
.521
30
15
.420
16. North Carolina
.699
7
2
.537
39
  Big 12
.499
19
11
.419
17. Florida State
.696
6
3
.604
5
  Mountain West
.457
25
22
.438
18. West Virginia
.693
7
1
.462
89
  Sun Belt
.438
17
25
.495
19. Virginia Tech
.692
7
2
.529
44
  Mid-American
.415
23
25
.427
20. Florida
.681
6
2
.534
41
  Conference USA
.389
20
30
.448
21. USC
.678
6
3
.584
11
  *non-conference play
22. Minnesota
.675
7
2
.509
56
 
23. Utah
.672
7
2
.506
57
 
24. Washington St.
.667
7
2
.500
63
 
25. Oklahoma
.666
7
2
.499
64
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Stanford
.665
6
3
.570
20
 
78.
Oregon
.474
3
6
.575
16
27.
Arkansas
.664
6
3
.569
22
 
79.
SMU
.471
4
5
.504
61
28.
South Florida
.662
7
2
.494
67
 
80.
Texas Tech
.464
4
5
.498
66
29.
Troy
.655
7
1
.419
109
 
81.
Cincinnati
.460
4
5
.494
68
30.
Houston
.652
7
2
.484
73
 
82.
Akron
.459
5
5
.459
95
31.
Wyoming
.645
7
2
.476
80
 
83.
Oregon State
.447
2
7
.618
1
32.
Tulsa
.639
7
2
.469
84
 
84.
Southern Miss
.440
5
4
.408
117
33.
LSU
.635
5
3
.563
25
 
85.
Central Michigan
.438
5
5
.438
99
34.
Navy
.632
6
2
.480
78
 
86.
Rutgers
.437
2
7
.608
4
35.
Appalachian St.
.632
7
2
.462
90
 
87.
Georgia Southern
.434
4
5
.467
85
36.
Oklahoma State
.630
7
2
.460
94
 
88.
Purdue
.434
3
6
.535
40
37.
Temple
.614
7
3
.494
69
 
89.
Army
.428
5
4
.396
123
38.
San Diego State
.612
8
1
.365
128
 
90.
UTSA
.426
5
4
.394
125
39.
Georgia
.594
5
4
.561
26
 
91.
East Carolina
.422
3
6
.523
48
40.
Kentucky
.589
5
4
.556
28
 
92.
Arkansas State
.422
4
4
.422
107
41.
Toledo
.582
7
2
.410
114
 
93.
Notre Dame
.415
3
6
.516
51
42.
Indiana
.578
5
4
.545
33
 
94.
Duke
.415
3
6
.515
52
43.
BYU
.577
5
4
.544
34
 
95.
Utah State
.405
3
6
.505
59
44.
South Carolina
.577
5
4
.544
35
 
96.
Hawaii
.402
4
6
.461
92
45.
Georgia Tech
.573
5
4
.540
36
 
97.
Arizona
.398
2
7
.569
21
46.
Wake Forest
.573
6
3
.472
81
 
98.
Michigan State
.396
2
7
.568
23
47.
Maryland
.572
5
4
.539
37
 
99.
Connecticut
.394
3
7
.515
53
48.
Pittsburgh
.571
5
4
.538
38
 
100.
Charlotte
.393
4
5
.425
106
49.
Mississippi
.570
4
5
.602
7
 
101.
Tulane
.382
3
6
.481
77
50.
Memphis
.566
6
3
.465
87
 
102.
South Alabama
.382
4
5
.414
111
51.
Miami, Fla.
.563
5
4
.530
43
 
103.
Missouri
.381
2
7
.552
30
52.
Baylor
.555
6
2
.402
118
 
104.
North Texas
.379
4
5
.411
113
53.
Northwestern
.551
4
5
.584
13
 
105.
Ball State
.377
4
5
.409
116
54.
Arizona State
.550
5
4
.517
49
 
106.
Miami, Ohio
.376
4
6
.434
102
55.
Iowa
.548
5
4
.515
54
 
107.
Northern Illinois
.372
3
6
.471
83
56.
Western Kentucky
.543
7
3
.422
108
 
108.
Kent State
.363
3
6
.461
91
57.
California
.541
4
5
.574
17
 
109.
LA Lafayette
.361
3
5
.433
103
58.
Central Florida
.534
5
4
.501
62
 
110.
LA Monroe
.359
3
6
.457
97
59.
Syracuse
.533
4
5
.566
24
 
111.
New Mexico State
.355
2
6
.505
60
60.
Air Force
.527
6
3
.426
105
 
112.
Virginia
.348
2
7
.517
50
61.
Texas
.525
5
4
.492
70
 
113.
San Jose State
.345
3
7
.462
88
62.
Vanderbilt
.524
4
5
.557
27
 
114.
UNLV
.332
3
6
.427
104
63.
N.C. State
.520
4
5
.553
29
 
115.
Fla. International
.331
3
7
.446
98
64.
Kansas State
.518
5
4
.484
72
 
116.
UTEP
.317
3
6
.411
112
65.
New Mexico
.516
6
3
.415
110
 
117.
Texas State
.312
2
6
.458
96
66.
Colorado State
.516
5
4
.482
75
 
118.
Massachusetts
.306
2
8
.484
74
67.
TCU
.516
5
4
.482
76
 
119.
Nevada
.306
3
6
.398
122
68.
Ohio
.515
7
3
.395
124
 
120.
Georgia State
.303
2
7
.465
86
69.
Louisiana Tech
.512
7
3
.391
126
 
121.
Kansas
.293
1
8
.533
42
70.
Idaho
.505
5
4
.471
82
 
122.
Marshall
.278
2
7
.435
101
71.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.501
6
3
.401
119
 
123.
Iowa State
.271
1
8
.506
58
72.
Old Dominion
.499
6
3
.399
120
 
124.
Bowling Green
.259
1
8
.491
71
73.
Boston College
.496
4
5
.529
45
 
125.
Buffalo
.248
2
7
.398
121
74.
Mississippi State
.495
4
5
.529
46
 
126.
Fresno State
.245
1
9
.480
79
75.
Eastern Michigan
.494
5
4
.460
93
 
127.
Florida Atlantic
.235
2
7
.380
127
76.
Illinois
.485
3
6
.586
10
 
128.
Rice
.201
1
8
.409
115
77.
UCLA
.479
3
6
.580
15
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2016 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved