Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Alabama and Clemson Are Back on Top

Vindicating the BCS

Bowl Championship Splendor

Poll on Fans’ View of BCS Standings vs. the Committee

  • With Alabama’s win over (now-#6) Texas A&M and (now-#13) Penn State’s upset of Ohio State, the same teams that finished #1 and #2 last year—Alabama and Clemson—are back on top
  • Only 9 undefeated teams remain, and 6 of them haven’t played a team in the current top-25
  • #87 Oregon, #96 Michigan State, and #108 Notre Dame—which played in the National Championship Game two years ago, the College Football Playoff last year, and the Fiesta Bowl last year, respectively—are amazingly each 2-5
  • The Big 12 (.500) is closer to the Sun Belt (.434) than to the ACC (.584), let alone to the Pac-12 (.595), Big Ten (.610), or SEC (.624)
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 24

Oct. 17 Rankings
Oct. 10 Rankings

Final 2015-16 Rankings
Final ’15 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.852
8
0
.589
11
1-0
1-0
0
2.
Clemson
.833
7
0
.555
21
0-0
3-0
0
3.
Michigan
.826
7
0
.543
26
0-0
3-0
0
4.
Nebraska
.802
7
0
.503
54
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Boise State
.801
7
0
.501
56
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Texas A&M
.793
6
1
.605
5
0-1
2-0
0
7.
Ohio State
.787
6
1
.597
7
0-0
2-1
0
8.
W. Michigan
.784
8
0
.476
79
0-0
0-0
0
9.
West Virginia
.776
6
0
.463
87
0-0
0-0
0
10.
Washington
.774
7
0
.461
89
0-0
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Tennessee
.769
5
2
.662
1
  Southeastern
.624
31
9
.456
12. Louisville
.755
6
1
.552
23
  Big Ten
.610
32
10
.450
13. Penn State
.745
5
2
.633
2
  Pac-12
.595
24
10
.470
14. Florida
.724
5
1
.530
34
  Atlantic Coast
.584
36
10
.409
15. Utah
.711
7
1
.483
69
  American Athletic
.523
29
14
.417
16. Wisconsin
.705
5
2
.585
13
  Big 12
.500
19
11
.420
17. Florida State
.702
5
2
.582
14
  Mountain West
.456
24
22
.443
18. Colorado
.699
6
2
.556
20
  Sun Belt
.434
16
23
.487
19. Baylor
.697
6
0
.365
125
  Mid-American
.415
23
25
.427
20. Auburn
.693
5
2
.572
16
  Conference USA
.388
19
30
.454
21. Navy
.679
5
1
.475
81
  *non-conference play
22. North Carolina
.677
6
2
.530
32
 
23. Troy
.664
6
1
.441
104
 
24. Minnesota
.654
5
2
.527
36
 
25. Oklahoma
.654
5
2
.527
38
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Washington State
.653
5
2
.527
39
 
78.
New Mexico
.470
4
3
.428
111
27.
Virginia Tech
.653
5
2
.527
40
 
79.
Southern Miss
.466
4
3
.424
112
28.
USC
.644
4
3
.604
6
 
80.
North Texas
.464
4
3
.421
114
29.
Houston
.643
6
2
.492
62
 
81.
Ohio
.461
5
3
.388
121
30.
Appalachian St.
.640
5
2
.513
47
 
82.
Texas Tech
.460
3
4
.503
53
31.
Toledo
.639
6
1
.414
116
 
83.
Purdue
.458
3
4
.501
57
32.
Pittsburgh
.638
5
2
.511
48
 
84.
Old Dominion
.456
4
3
.414
117
33.
LSU
.638
5
2
.510
50
 
85.
Hawaii
.446
4
4
.446
100
34.
Wake Forest
.636
5
2
.508
51
 
86.
Connecticut
.441
3
5
.516
45
35.
Stanford
.631
4
3
.591
9
 
87.
Oregon
.441
2
5
.572
15
36.
South Florida
.630
6
2
.478
75
 
88.
Duke
.438
3
4
.481
70
37.
Arkansas
.626
5
3
.553
22
 
89.
Rutgers
.436
2
6
.589
10
38.
Maryland
.619
5
2
.490
63
 
90.
Tulane
.436
3
4
.478
73
39.
Wyoming
.594
5
2
.464
86
 
91.
Texas
.436
3
4
.478
74
40.
Tulsa
.593
5
2
.462
88
 
92.
Utah State
.435
3
4
.478
76
41.
Kentucky
.590
4
3
.547
25
 
93.
Boston College
.435
3
4
.477
77
42.
San Diego State
.587
6
1
.362
126
 
94.
Missouri
.434
2
5
.565
18
43.
Arizona State
.585
5
3
.510
49
 
95.
Arizona
.420
2
5
.551
24
44.
Georgia
.584
4
3
.542
27
 
96.
Michigan State
.403
2
5
.534
30
45.
Northwestern
.582
4
3
.539
28
 
97.
LA Lafayette
.401
3
4
.443
101
46.
Memphis
.581
5
2
.450
98
 
98.
Army
.398
4
3
.357
127
47.
Oklahoma State
.579
5
2
.448
99
 
99.
Mississippi State
.395
2
5
.525
42
48.
Georgia Tech
.576
4
3
.534
29
 
100.
South Alabama
.388
3
4
.430
106
49.
California
.573
4
3
.531
31
 
101.
East Carolina
.385
2
5
.514
46
50.
Miami, Fla.
.572
4
3
.529
35
 
102.
UNLV
.379
3
5
.452
94
51.
Temple
.572
5
3
.496
59
 
103.
Ball State
.376
4
4
.376
123
52.
BYU
.570
4
4
.570
17
 
104.
Virginia
.375
2
5
.504
52
53.
N.C. State
.569
4
3
.526
41
 
105.
Arkansas State
.359
2
4
.456
91
54.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.560
5
2
.429
109
 
106.
Georgia State
.356
2
5
.484
67
55.
Mississippi
.552
3
4
.594
8
 
107.
Charlotte
.356
3
5
.428
110
56.
Iowa
.550
5
3
.474
82
 
108.
Notre Dame
.356
2
5
.483
68
57.
Central Florida
.544
4
3
.501
58
 
109.
UTSA
.353
3
4
.393
120
58.
Eastern Michigan
.543
5
3
.467
85
 
110.
New Mexico State
.350
2
5
.476
78
59.
Central Michigan
.532
5
3
.457
90
 
111.
Fla. International
.346
3
5
.417
115
60.
Akron
.532
5
3
.456
92
 
112.
LA Monroe
.343
2
5
.470
84
61.
Vanderbilt
.530
4
4
.530
33
 
113.
Northern Illinois
.340
2
6
.488
64
62.
Western Kentucky
.527
5
3
.452
96
 
114.
Marshall
.328
2
5
.452
95
63.
TCU
.527
4
3
.484
66
 
115.
Texas State
.308
2
5
.430
107
64.
Kansas State
.524
4
3
.481
71
 
116.
Nevada
.307
3
5
.374
124
65.
Syracuse
.522
4
4
.522
43
 
117.
San Jose State
.299
2
6
.443
102
66.
Indiana
.522
3
4
.564
19
 
118.
Kent State
.296
2
6
.439
105
67.
UCLA
.511
3
5
.586
12
 
119.
UTEP
.284
2
5
.402
119
68.
Colorado State
.501
4
4
.501
55
 
120.
Miami, Ohio
.283
2
6
.423
113
69.
Cincinnati
.496
4
3
.453
93
 
121.
Kansas
.282
1
6
.495
61
70.
Air Force
.494
4
3
.451
97
 
122.
Bowling Green
.271
1
7
.496
60
71.
Idaho
.486
4
4
.486
65
 
123.
Iowa State
.266
1
6
.475
80
72.
Illinois
.486
2
5
.615
3
 
124.
Fresno State
.258
1
7
.479
72
73.
Oregon State
.486
2
5
.615
4
 
125.
Massachusetts
.254
1
7
.473
83
74.
SMU
.484
3
4
.527
37
 
126.
Rice
.240
1
6
.442
103
75.
Louisiana Tech
.484
5
3
.409
118
 
127.
Florida Atlantic
.202
1
6
.387
122
76.
South Carolina
.473
3
4
.516
44
 
128.
Buffalo
.174
1
6
.345
128
77.
Georgia Southern
.472
4
3
.429
108
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2016 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved