Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

LSU Finishes #1 in Historic Fashion

  • The LSU Tigers earn the highest rating (.852) in the history of the Anderson & Hester Rankings, beating the record held by the 2005-06 Texas Longhorns (.849)
  • On their way to going 15-0, the Tigers beat #3 Clemson, #5 Georgia, #7 Oklahoma, #9 Florida, and #11 Alabama, as well as #19 Auburn, #27 Texas, and #30 Texas A&M
  • The SEC, which went a combined 8-2 in the bowls and the national championship game, finishes as the top conference
  • (11-2) Navy and (11-2) Air Force both finish in the top-25
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, 2019-20

Jan. 3 Rankings
Dec. 8 Rankings
Dec. 2 Rankings
Nov. 25 Rankings
Nov. 18 Rankings
Nov. 11 Rankings
Nov. 4 Rankings
Oct. 28 Rankings
Oct. 21 Rankings
Oct. 14 Rankings
Oct. 7 Rankings

Final 2018-19 Rankings
Final ’18 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
LSU
.852
15
0
.590
6
4-0
2-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.816
13
1
.587
7
1-1
4-0
0
3.
Clemson
.792
14
1
.546
28
1-1
0-0
0
4.
Penn State
.779
11
2
.593
5
1-1
2-1
0
5.
Georgia
.778
12
2
.583
9
2-1
2-0
1
6.
Notre Dame
.751
11
2
.555
22
0-1
1-1
0
7.
Oklahoma
.748
12
2
.543
32
0-1
2-0
1
8.
Oregon
.747
12
2
.542
35
0-0
2-1
1
9.
Florida
.745
11
2
.546
27
0-2
1-0
0
10.
Memphis
.743
12
2
.536
41
0-1
4-0
1

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Alabama
.725
11
2
.521
52
  Southeastern
.618
50
16
.460
12.
Minnesota
.724
11
2
.521
54
  Big Ten
.613
38
13
.464
13.
Navy
.719
11
2
.514
62
  Pac-12
.583
28
15
.492
14.
Wisconsin
.716
10
4
.598
2
  American Athletic
.565
38
17
.448
15.
Appalachian St.
.714
13
1
.444
102
  Big 12
.561
25
11
.443
16.
Iowa
.713
10
3
.559
19
  Atlantic Coast
.532
39
26
.472
17.
Cincinnati
.710
11
3
.545
29
  Mountain West
.501
35
21
.426
18.
Boise State
.706
12
2
.490
77
  Sun Belt
.473
25
20
.440
19.
Auburn
.700
9
4
.594
3
  Conference USA
.407
27
37
.453
20.
Michigan
.700
9
4
.593
4
  Mid-American
.406
21
34
.476
21.
Utah
.691
11
3
.522
50
  *non-conference play
22.
Baylor
.690
11
3
.521
51
 
23.
Air Force
.689
11
2
.477
86
 
24.
SMU
.673
10
3
.513
63
 
25.
UCF
.649
10
3
.486
82
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
USC
.643
8
5
.577
12
 
79.
Georgia State
.464
7
6
.441
104
27.
Texas
.632
8
5
.565
17
 
80.
Kent State
.463
7
6
.440
105
28.
Louisiana 
.631
11
3
.456
95
 
81.
Duke
.461
5
7
.511
66
29.
Florida Atlantic
.630
11
3
.455
96
 
82.
Purdue
.459
4
8
.560
18
30.
Texas A&M
.619
8
5
.552
23
 
83.
Liberty
.457
8
5
.389
126
31.
Washington
.613
8
5
.545
30
 
84.
Southern Miss
.457
7
6
.434
109
32.
Tennessee
.610
8
5
.542
33
 
85.
Houston
.449
4
8
.550
24
33.
Virginia
.601
9
5
.516
58
 
86.
South Florida
.449
4
8
.550
25
34.
San Diego State
.601
10
3
.435
108
 
87.
Charlotte
.442
7
6
.419
113
35.
Louisville
.597
8
5
.529
44
 
88.
Central Michigan
.441
8
6
.399
125
36.
Oklahoma State
.595
8
5
.526
46
 
89.
Mississippi
.440
4
8
.541
36
37.
Michigan State
.593
7
6
.570
13
 
90.
Syracuse
.440
5
7
.490
80
38.
Arizona State
.593
8
5
.524
47
 
91.
LA Monroe
.440
5
7
.490
81
39.
Kansas State
.592
8
5
.523
49
 
92.
Ohio
.436
7
6
.414
116
40.
Hawaii
.590
10
5
.490
79
 
93.
Western Michigan
.434
7
6
.412
118
41.
California
.581
8
5
.512
64
 
94.
Arizona
.434
4
8
.534
42
42.
Indiana
.580
8
5
.511
65
 
95.
San Jose State
.417
5
7
.467
90
43.
Kentucky
.576
8
5
.507
67
 
96.
Maryland
.414
3
9
.568
15
44.
Iowa State
.572
7
6
.549
26
 
97.
Toledo
.406
6
6
.406
120
45.
Temple
.569
8
5
.500
72
 
98.
Texas Tech
.402
4
8
.502
69
46.
Wake Forest
.563
8
5
.494
74
 
99.
Northwestern
.402
3
9
.555
21
47.
Pittsburgh
.561
8
5
.491
76
 
100.
Fresno State
.393
4
8
.492
75
48.
Mississippi State
.546
6
7
.568
14
 
101.
Vanderbilt
.387
3
9
.540
38
49.
Tulane
.544
7
6
.521
53
 
102.
Army
.385
5
8
.452
97
50.
North Carolina
.543
7
6
.520
57
 
103.
Fla. International
.384
6
7
.406
121
51.
Wyoming
.538
8
5
.469
89
 
104.
Eastern Michigan
.382
6
7
.404
122
52.
Utah State
.538
7
6
.515
60
 
105.
N.C. State
.382
4
8
.481
85
53.
BYU
.538
7
6
.515
61
 
106.
Troy
.381
5
7
.430
110
54.
Virginia Tech
.535
8
5
.465
92
 
107.
Coastal Carolina
.379
5
7
.427
111
55.
Western Kentucky
.532
9
4
.416
115
 
108.
Georgia Tech
.379
3
9
.531
43
56.
Marshall
.531
8
5
.462
93
 
109.
Ball State
.378
5
7
.426
112
57.
Louisiana Tech
.529
10
3
.365
130
 
110.
Kansas
.375
3
9
.527
45
58.
Arkansas State
.519
8
5
.450
100
 
111.
Rutgers
.373
2
10
.581
10
59.
Florida State
.516
6
7
.539
39
 
112.
UNLV
.371
4
8
.470
87
60.
Colorado
.508
5
7
.558
20
 
113.
Colorado State
.371
4
8
.469
88
61.
Georgia Southern
.506
7
6
.483
84
 
114.
East Carolina
.367
4
8
.465
91
62.
Missouri
.504
6
6
.504
68
 
115.
Northern Illinois
.355
5
7
.403
123
63.
Boston College
.501
6
7
.524
48
 
116.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.353
4
8
.451
98
64.
Miami, Ohio
.501
8
6
.458
94
 
117.
Arkansas
.337
2
10
.542
34
65.
South Carolina
.500
4
8
.600
1
 
118.
Texas State
.336
3
9
.484
83
66.
Washington State
.497
6
7
.520
55
 
119.
UTSA
.320
4
8
.414
117
67.
Nebraska
.495
5
7
.545
31
 
120.
North Texas
.317
4
8
.411
119
68.
Illinois
.492
6
7
.515
59
 
121.
Rice
.306
3
9
.450
99
69.
TCU
.490
5
7
.540
37
 
122.
New Mexico
.300
2
10
.500
70
70.
Oregon State
.489
5
7
.539
40
 
123.
Bowling Green
.297
3
9
.440
106
71.
Buffalo
.486
8
5
.417
114
 
124.
Connecticut
.295
2
10
.495
73
72.
Tulsa
.483
4
8
.584
8
 
125.
South Alabama
.292
2
10
.490
78
73.
Miami, Fla.
.477
6
7
.500
71
 
126.
New Mexico State
.248
2
10
.436
107
74.
UCLA
.477
4
8
.577
11
 
127.
Old Dominion
.210
1
11
.444
103
75.
UAB
.472
9
5
.387
127
 
128.
Massachusetts
.171
1
11
.383
128
76.
Nevada
.471
7
6
.448
101
 
129.
UTEP
.169
1
11
.380
129
77.
West Virginia
.470
5
7
.520
56
 
130.
Akron
.143
0
12
.400
124
78.
Stanford
.465
4
8
.566
16
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season’s sixth week, and each team’s ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team’s opponents and opponents’ opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences’ strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2020 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved