Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

LSU Reclaims the Top Spot

  • The #1 Tigers have 4 wins versus the current top-25; the rest of the top-10 has 6 wins combined versus the current top-25
  • Alabama, which has no wins versus the current top-25, is ranked outside of the top-10 for the first time since December 5, 2010, nearly 9 years ago
  • #3 Baylor (undefeated with 2 road wins over the current top-30) and #4 Minnesota (undefeated with a win over #6 Penn State) have accomplished the most to date of any teams except for #1 LSU and #2 Ohio State
  • The #2-5 conferences—the Big 12 (.589), SEC (.582), American Athletic Conference (.576), and Pac-12 (.574)—are all within .015 or less of each other, while they are all at least .034 behind the #1 Big Ten and .027 ahead of the #6 ACC
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 11

Nov. 4 Rankings
Oct. 28 Rankings
Oct. 21 Rankings
Oct. 14 Rankings
Oct. 7 Rankings

Final 2018-19 Rankings
Final ’18 Pre-Bowl Rankings

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
LSU
.843
9
0
.574
16
0-0
4-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.829
9
0
.548
34
1-0
1-0
0
3.
Baylor
.813
9
0
.520
52
0-0
0-0
0
4.
Minnesota
.811
9
0
.518
54
1-0
0-0
0
5.
Clemson
.802
10
0
.503
73
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Penn State
.786
8
1
.571
17
0-1
1-0
0
7.
Cincinnati
.763
8
1
.539
40
0-1
0-0
0
8.
Oregon
.758
8
1
.532
46
0-0
0-1
0
9.
SMU
.755
9
1
.520
53
0-0
0-1
0
10.
Georgia
.749
8
1
.520
51
0-0
2-0
1

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11.
Oklahoma
.742
8
1
.511
59
  Big Ten
.623
33
8
.434
12.
Memphis
.739
8
1
.507
64
  Big 12
.589
24
6
.402
13.
Alabama
.738
8
1
.506
67
  Southeastern
.582
34
13
.445
14.
Michigan
.735
7
2
.581
13
  American Athletic
.576
33
13
.444
15.
Auburn
.733
7
2
.578
14
  Pac-12
.574
24
11
.461
16.
Boise State
.730
8
1
.496
79
  Atlantic Coast
.547
31
14
.432
17.
Utah
.728
8
1
.493
81
  Mountain West
.497
29
18
.427
18.
Navy
.728
7
1
.503
72
  Sun Belt
.472
22
18
.442
19.
Notre Dame
.723
7
2
.566
19
  Conference USA
.409
23
31
.453
20.
Wisconsin
.721
7
2
.564
22
  Mid-American
.403
18
30
.477
21.
Florida
.705
8
2
.529
48
  *non-conference play
22.
Appalachian St.
.686
8
1
.442
103
 
23.
Texas
.677
6
3
.583
11
 
24.
Air Force
.672
7
2
.506
68
 
25.
Wake Forest
.665
7
2
.498
77
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Iowa
.665
6
3
.569
18
 
79.
Colorado
.491
4
6
.551
31
27.
Oklahoma State
.660
6
3
.564
21
 
80.
Western Michigan
.491
6
4
.431
112
28.
Kansas State
.654
6
3
.558
27
 
81.
Maryland
.485
3
7
.606
3
29.
USC
.647
6
4
.590
8
 
82.
Texas Tech
.480
4
5
.513
58
30.
Indiana
.646
7
2
.477
90
 
83.
Arizona
.476
4
5
.510
62
31.
Virginia
.634
7
3
.514
56
 
84.
N.C. State
.470
4
5
.504
70
32.
Louisiana 
.624
7
2
.453
97
 
85.
LA Monroe
.466
4
5
.499
76
33.
UCF
.621
7
3
.501
75
 
86.
Washington State
.465
4
5
.498
78
34.
BYU
.615
5
4
.583
10
 
87.
Buffalo
.465
5
4
.432
111
35.
Louisville
.614
5
4
.581
12
 
88.
Western Kentucky
.462
6
4
.403
121
36.
Washington
.612
6
4
.554
29
 
89.
Fresno State
.454
4
5
.487
84
37.
Texas A&M
.610
6
3
.510
61
 
90.
West Virginia
.452
3
6
.553
30
38.
Temple
.606
6
3
.507
65
 
91.
Central Michigan
.446
6
4
.388
123
39.
Pittsburgh
.606
6
3
.507
66
 
92.
Mississippi
.444
4
6
.504
69
40.
Tulane
.604
6
3
.504
71
 
93.
Houston
.436
3
6
.537
41
41.
Louisiana Tech
.598
8
1
.351
129
 
94.
Kansas
.435
3
6
.536
44
42.
Miami, Fla.
.598
6
4
.539
39
 
95.
Liberty
.427
6
4
.369
128
43.
Iowa State
.596
5
4
.563
23
 
96.
UAB
.426
6
3
.331
130
44.
Florida State
.594
5
5
.594
6
 
97.
San Jose State
.424
4
6
.484
86
45.
San Diego State
.592
7
2
.420
115
 
98.
Charlotte
.421
5
5
.421
114
46.
Illinois
.590
6
4
.531
47
 
99.
Syracuse
.417
3
6
.518
55
47.
Utah State
.582
5
4
.549
33
 
100.
Ohio
.408
4
5
.441
104
48.
Michigan State
.580
4
5
.613
2
 
101.
Eastern Michigan
.408
4
5
.440
106
49.
Virginia Tech
.576
6
3
.475
91
 
102.
Ball State
.402
4
5
.434
109
50.
Florida Atlantic
.565
7
3
.443
102
 
103.
Coastal Carolina
.401
4
5
.433
110
51.
Mississippi State
.565
4
5
.597
4
 
104.
Rutgers
.395
2
7
.566
20
52.
North Carolina
.560
4
5
.593
7
 
105.
Texas State
.394
3
6
.493
80
53.
Wyoming
.558
6
3
.457
96
 
106.
Georgia Tech
.390
2
7
.562
26
54.
TCU
.557
4
5
.590
9
 
107.
Colorado State
.387
4
5
.419
116
55.
Tennessee
.551
5
5
.551
32
 
108.
Fla. International
.382
5
5
.382
125
56.
Hawaii
.549
6
4
.489
82
 
109.
Army
.382
4
6
.440
105
57.
California
.547
5
4
.514
57
 
110.
East Carolina
.382
3
7
.502
74
58.
Arizona State
.542
5
4
.508
63
 
111.
North Texas
.382
4
6
.440
107
59.
Marshall
.537
6
3
.436
108
 
112.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.382
3
6
.481
88
60.
Nevada
.533
6
4
.473
93
 
113.
Vanderbilt
.377
2
7
.548
35
61.
UCLA
.529
4
5
.563
24
 
114.
Troy
.366
4
5
.398
122
62.
Boston College
.528
5
5
.528
49
 
115.
UTSA
.354
4
5
.385
124
63.
Stanford
.524
4
5
.557
28
 
116.
Kent State
.354
3
6
.451
98
64.
Miami, Ohio
.522
5
4
.489
83
 
117.
Bowling Green
.351
3
6
.447
99
65.
Georgia State
.518
6
3
.417
117
 
118.
Northwestern
.348
1
8
.595
5
66.
Purdue
.517
4
6
.577
15
 
119.
Connecticut
.340
2
8
.523
50
67.
Tulsa
.517
3
7
.636
1
 
120.
Arkansas
.330
2
8
.511
60
68.
Georgia Southern
.517
5
4
.484
87
 
121.
Northern Illinois
.318
3
6
.412
118
69.
Arkansas State
.513
5
4
.479
89
 
122.
UNLV
.303
2
7
.466
95
70.
Southern Miss
.511
6
3
.411
119
 
123.
New Mexico
.288
2
7
.447
100
71.
Toledo
.509
6
3
.409
120
 
124.
South Alabama
.246
1
8
.473
92
72.
Duke
.507
4
5
.541
36
 
125.
Rice
.226
0
9
.539
38
73.
Nebraska
.506
4
5
.540
37
 
126.
Old Dominion
.219
1
9
.444
101
74.
Oregon State
.504
4
5
.537
42
 
127.
UTEP
.214
1
8
.429
113
75.
Kentucky
.504
4
5
.537
43
 
128.
New Mexico State
.191
0
9
.487
85
76.
Missouri
.502
5
4
.469
94
 
129.
Massachusetts
.174
1
9
.376
127
77.
South Carolina
.502
4
6
.562
25
 
130.
Akron
.133
0
9
.381
126
78.
South Florida
.499
4
5
.532
45
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2019 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved