Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

Florida Premiers at #1

Four Is Enough

Poll on Fans’ View of BCS Standings vs. the Committee

Vindicating the BCS

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • The Gators edge the Utes for the top spot in the 2015 season's inaugural rankings
  • TCU is #3
  • Baylor, the lowest-ranked undefeated team (at #25) based on accomplishments to date, has played the 2nd-easiest schedule of the 128 FBS teams
  • #12 Michigan has been the top 1-loss team to date
  • Texas has played the nation's toughest schedule
  • The SEC has been the best conference so far, with the Big Ten not too far behind
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 12

Final 2014-15 Rankings
Final '14 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Florida
.839
6
0
.566
13
0-0
1-0
0
2.
Utah
.836
5
0
.560
15
0-0
2-0
0
3.
TCU
.820
6
0
.532
33
0-0
0-0
0
4.
Clemson
.815
5
0
.524
40
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Texas A&M
.813
5
0
.521
43
0-0
0-0
0
6.
LSU
.811
5
0
.518
47
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Ohio State
.806
6
0
.509
58
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Temple
.800
5
0
.500
62
0-0
1-0
0
9.
Toledo
.789
5
0
.483
77
0-0
0-0
0
10.
Oklahoma St.
.786
6
0
.478
81
0-0
0-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Michigan State
.783
6
0
.474
83
  Southeastern
.655
33
4
.406
12. Michigan
.783
5
1
.607
3
  Big Ten
.637
42
13
.476
13. Florida State
.782
5
0
.472
86
  Pac-12
.608
28
7
.422
14. Iowa
.763
6
0
.446
101
  Big 12
.605
23
7
.441
15. Northwestern
.758
5
1
.573
11
  Atlantic Coast
.548
33
15
.434
16. Notre Dame
.756
5
1
.570
12
  American Athletic
.511
25
17
.453
17. Oklahoma
.750
4
1
.586
7
  Mid-American
.460
21
29
.508
18. Memphis
.749
5
0
.427
111
  Mountain West
.413
17
27
.480
19. Alabama
.738
5
1
.547
23
  Conference USA
.394
19
27
.445
20. California
.735
5
1
.543
26
  Sun Belt
.367
13
28
.475
21. Houston
.733
5
0
.407
120
  *non-conference play
22. UCLA
.723
4
1
.551
20
 
23. Kentucky
.711
4
1
.536
29
 
24. Penn State
.709
5
1
.510
56
 
25. Baylor
.706
5
0
.375
127
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Stanford
.700
4
1
.524
41
 
78.
Akron
.472
3
3
.472
85
27.
BYU
.683
4
2
.589
6
 
79.
Iowa State
.463
2
3
.524
42
28.
Western Kentucky
.680
5
1
.476
82
 
80.
Northern Illinois
.460
3
3
.460
92
29.
Mississippi
.677
5
1
.474
84
 
81.
Boston College
.460
3
3
.460
93
30.
Pittsburgh
.665
4
1
.483
76
 
82.
Nevada
.459
3
3
.459
94
31.
Navy
.663
4
1
.481
78
 
83.
South Alabama
.457
3
2
.398
122
32.
Boise State
.662
5
1
.456
99
 
84.
Vanderbilt
.454
2
3
.515
53
33.
Minnesota
.652
4
2
.555
17
 
85.
Georgia Tech
.454
2
4
.555
18
34.
Duke
.644
5
1
.437
108
 
86.
Connecticut
.449
3
3
.449
100
35.
Missouri
.642
4
2
.545
24
 
87.
Rice
.446
3
3
.446
102
36.
Ohio
.640
5
1
.433
110
 
88.
Colorado
.445
3
3
.445
103
37.
Indiana
.639
4
2
.542
28
 
89.
Arkansas State
.444
2
3
.504
59
38.
Mississippi State
.633
4
2
.535
32
 
90.
Nebraska
.441
2
4
.542
27
39.
Wisconsin
.619
4
2
.520
44
 
91.
Ball State
.431
2
4
.532
34
40.
USC
.618
3
2
.560
14
 
92.
Central Michigan
.430
2
4
.531
35
41.
Marshall
.617
5
1
.408
119
 
93.
Rutgers
.426
2
3
.486
73
42.
Arizona State
.616
4
2
.517
50
 
94.
San Jose State
.420
3
3
.420
114
43.
Texas Tech
.610
4
2
.510
57
 
95.
Kent State
.417
2
4
.517
49
44.
Georgia
.602
4
2
.502
61
 
96.
Hawaii
.412
2
4
.512
55
45.
Bowling Green
.597
4
2
.497
66
 
97.
Southern Miss
.409
3
3
.409
118
46.
Arizona
.596
4
2
.496
69
 
98.
Tulane
.406
2
3
.465
90
47.
Georgia Southern
.596
4
1
.410
116
 
99.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.400
2
4
.500
63
48.
North Carolina
.596
4
1
.409
117
 
100.
LA Lafayette
.400
2
3
.459
95
49.
West Virginia
.595
3
2
.536
31
 
101.
Buffalo
.399
2
3
.458
96
50.
Texas
.595
2
4
.688
1
 
102.
UNLV
.398
2
4
.498
65
51.
Tennessee
.592
3
3
.592
5
 
103.
Massachusetts
.389
1
4
.575
9
52.
Washington
.590
3
2
.530
37
 
104.
Virginia
.387
1
4
.574
10
53.
Auburn
.589
3
2
.530
38
 
105.
New Mexico
.387
3
3
.387
125
54.
Kansas State
.587
3
2
.527
39
 
106.
Fla. International
.384
3
3
.384
126
55.
Illinois
.585
4
2
.485
75
 
107.
Old Dominion
.363
2
3
.420
113
56.
Cincinnati
.572
3
2
.513
54
 
108.
Colorado State
.360
2
4
.458
97
57.
Syracuse
.559
3
2
.499
64
 
109.
Purdue
.351
1
5
.557
16
58.
Tulsa
.557
3
2
.497
67
 
110.
LA Monroe
.347
1
4
.531
36
59.
Appalachian St.
.550
4
1
.365
128
 
111.
Charlotte
.341
2
3
.397
123
60.
East Carolina
.550
3
3
.550
21
 
112.
Texas State
.317
1
4
.496
68
61.
Arkansas
.544
2
4
.642
2
 
113.
UTSA
.316
1
5
.519
45
62.
Louisiana Tech
.534
4
2
.433
109
 
114.
Miami, Ohio
.316
1
5
.519
46
63.
Utah State
.528
3
2
.468
88
 
115.
SMU
.313
1
5
.516
51
64.
Miami, Fla.
.528
3
2
.467
89
 
116.
Fresno State
.313
1
5
.516
52
65.
N.C. State
.520
4
2
.419
115
 
117.
Idaho
.307
1
4
.485
74
66.
Virginia Tech
.503
3
3
.503
60
 
118.
UTEP
.307
2
4
.399
121
67.
Air Force
.500
3
2
.440
106
 
119.
Troy
.302
1
4
.479
79
68.
South Carolina
.497
2
4
.597
4
 
120.
Georgia State
.294
1
4
.469
87
69.
Oregon
.495
3
3
.495
70
 
121.
Florida Atlantic
.273
1
4
.444
104
70.
Louisville
.493
2
3
.553
19
 
122.
Army
.268
1
5
.460
91
71.
Wake Forest
.491
3
3
.491
71
 
123.
Eastern Michigan
.253
1
5
.442
105
72.
Western Michigan
.488
2
3
.548
22
 
124.
Kansas
.212
0
5
.518
48
73.
South Florida
.483
2
3
.543
25
 
125.
New Mexico State
.193
0
5
.489
72
74.
Washington State
.481
3
2
.421
112
 
126.
Central Florida
.174
0
6
.458
98
75.
San Diego State
.478
3
3
.478
80
 
127.
North Texas
.162
0
5
.437
107
76.
Maryland
.476
2
4
.577
8
 
128.
Wyoming
.141
0
6
.397
124
77.
Oregon State
.476
2
3
.536
30
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2015 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved