Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

Part of the BCS Throughout Its Entire 16-Year Run...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules—to Date

Georgia Premiers at #1

Bowl Championship Splendor

  • The Bulldogs have accomplished the most of any team to date, posting a 6-0 record and winning at #16 Notre Dame
  • Clemson, Penn St., UCF, Washington St., and Alabama are all hot on the Bulldogs’ heels, as the top 6 teams are separated by less than .015
  • Florida St. has played the toughest schedule to date by almost 100 points (.098), and as a result the (1-3) Seminoles are ranked ahead of 38 teams with 3 or more wins
  • The Big Ten has been the top conference so far
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 9

Final 2016-17 Rankings
Final ’16 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Georgia
.833
6
0
.554
21
0-0
1-0
0
2.
Clemson
.831
6
0
.552
24
0-0
0-0
0
3.
Penn State
.826
6
0
.542
30
0-0
1-0
0
4.
UCF
.821
4
0
.533
38
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Washington St.
.819
6
0
.531
42
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Alabama
.819
6
0
.530
43
0-0
0-0
0
7.
TCU
.810
5
0
.516
50
0-0
1-0
0
8.
Miami, Fla.
.799
4
0
.498
60
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Navy
.791
5
0
.486
67
0-0
0-0
0
10.
Wisconsin
.791
5
0
.486
68
0-0
0-0
0

Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. USC
.785
5
1
.611
6
  Big Ten
.639
32
10
.480
12. San Diego State
.780
6
0
.469
80
  Southeastern
.627
31
7
.431
13. Michigan
.767
4
1
.608
8
  Pac-12
.611
27
7
.429
14. Michigan State
.760
4
1
.599
10
  Atlantic Coast
.589
30
11
.448
15. Washington
.754
6
0
.434
103
  American Athletic
.541
23
13
.457
16. Notre Dame
.751
5
1
.564
16
  Big 12
.534
20
10
.433
17. N.C. State
.726
5
1
.531
41
  Mountain West
.466
20
23
.487
18. Ohio State
.723
5
1
.528
44
  Mid-American
.430
21
26
.462
19. Iowa
.712
4
2
.623
5
  Conference USA
.398
21
28
.439
20. Kentucky
.702
5
1
.503
53
  Sun Belt
.342
13
26
.438
21. South Florida
.701
5
0
.370
122
  *non-conference play
22. Stanford
.700
4
2
.609
7
 
23. Houston
.697
4
1
.520
48
 
24. Oklahoma State
.695
4
1
.518
49
 
25. Florida
.685
3
2
.631
2
 
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


 

RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Texas Tech
.681
4
1
.501
56
 
79.
Syracuse
.477
3
3
.477
74
27.
Memphis
.677
4
1
.496
62
 
80.
Akron
.474
3
3
.474
76
28.
Virginia Tech
.673
5
1
.469
81
 
81.
Temple
.473
3
3
.473
77
29.
Auburn
.667
5
1
.462
88
 
82.
LA Monroe
.469
3
2
.410
111
30.
South Carolina
.662
4
2
.566
15
 
83.
Cincinnati
.467
2
4
.568
14
31.
Oklahoma
.654
4
1
.471
79
 
84.
New Mexico
.467
3
2
.407
112
32.
Virginia
.651
4
1
.467
83
 
85.
UTSA
.466
3
1
.320
130
33.
Maryland
.648
3
2
.592
11
 
86.
Ohio
.465
4
2
.367
123
34.
Troy
.645
4
1
.461
90
 
87.
Utah State
.463
3
3
.463
87
35.
Wake Forest
.638
4
2
.540
31
 
88.
Fla. International
.461
3
2
.402
115
36.
Louisville
.630
4
2
.532
39
 
89.
Buffalo
.456
3
3
.456
95
37.
Texas A&M
.626
4
2
.527
45
 
90.
Mississippi
.442
2
3
.502
55
38.
Oregon
.625
4
2
.526
46
 
91.
Louisiana Tech
.433
3
3
.433
104
39.
UCLA
.619
3
2
.561
17
 
92.
Kansas State
.424
3
2
.366
124
40.
Boise State
.619
3
2
.561
18
 
93.
UAB
.419
3
2
.361
125
41.
Toledo
.614
4
1
.428
105
 
94.
Western Kentucky
.410
3
2
.353
127
42.
Purdue
.611
3
2
.552
23
 
95.
Pittsburgh
.409
2
4
.510
51
43.
Mississippi State
.609
3
2
.550
25
 
96.
UNLV
.402
2
3
.461
89
44.
Marshall
.607
4
1
.421
108
 
97.
Central Michigan
.399
3
3
.399
117
45.
Utah
.606
4
1
.420
109
 
98.
Eastern Michigan
.396
2
3
.455
96
46.
Texas
.604
3
2
.545
27
 
99.
Oregon State
.396
1
5
.605
9
47.
LSU
.603
4
2
.504
52
 
100.
Arkansas State
.391
2
2
.391
121
48.
SMU
.601
4
2
.501
57
 
101.
Missouri
.387
1
4
.573
13
49.
Minnesota
.595
3
2
.536
35
 
102.
Air Force
.372
1
4
.557
20
50.
Florida State
.592
1
3
.729
1
 
103.
New Mexico State
.367
2
4
.466
85
51.
Iowa State
.591
3
2
.532
40
 
104.
Rutgers
.355
1
4
.540
33
52.
Indiana
.583
3
2
.523
47
 
105.
Georgia State
.351
2
2
.351
128
53.
Western Michigan
.576
4
2
.475
75
 
106.
North Carolina
.350
1
5
.557
19
54.
Vanderbilt
.576
3
3
.576
12
 
107.
Miami, Ohio
.349
2
4
.446
99
55.
Duke
.568
4
2
.468
82
 
108.
Tulsa
.347
1
5
.554
22
56.
Arizona State
.566
2
3
.624
4
 
109.
Louisiana 
.345
2
3
.402
116
57.
Georgia Tech
.560
3
1
.406
114
 
110.
Old Dominion
.341
2
3
.397
118
58.
North Texas
.558
3
2
.498
59
 
111.
BYU
.341
1
5
.547
26
59.
Colorado State
.557
4
2
.456
94
 
112.
Ball State
.339
2
4
.435
102
60.
Tulane
.556
3
2
.496
63
 
113.
Kent State
.329
1
5
.533
37
61.
Tennessee
.553
3
2
.492
65
 
114.
Connecticut
.311
1
4
.489
66
62.
Northern Illinois
.545
3
2
.485
71
 
115.
Idaho
.306
2
3
.360
126
63.
California
.540
3
3
.540
32
 
116.
Hawaii
.304
2
4
.396
119
64.
Fresno State
.537
3
2
.477
73
 
117.
Rice
.300
1
5
.500
58
65.
Nebraska
.534
3
3
.534
36
 
118.
East Carolina
.288
1
5
.486
69
66.
Southern Miss
.531
3
2
.471
78
 
119.
Nevada
.288
1
5
.485
70
67.
Boston College
.528
2
4
.627
3
 
120.
San Jose State
.287
1
6
.502
54
68.
West Virginia
.527
3
2
.467
84
 
121.
Kansas
.284
1
4
.458
93
69.
Army
.517
4
2
.416
110
 
122.
Bowling Green
.271
1
5
.465
86
70.
Appalachian St.
.509
3
2
.449
98
 
123.
South Alabama
.260
1
4
.428
106
71.
Arizona
.505
3
2
.445
100
 
124.
Texas State
.252
1
5
.440
101
72.
Florida Atlantic
.497
3
3
.497
61
 
125.
Coastal Carolina
.187
1
4
.328
129
73.
Colorado
.495
3
3
.495
64
 
126.
Georgia Southern
.176
0
4
.460
91
74.
Northwestern
.484
2
3
.544
28
 
127.
UTEP
.175
0
6
.460
92
75.
Wyoming
.484
3
2
.424
107
 
128.
Baylor
.170
0
5
.451
97
76.
Illinois
.483
2
3
.543
29
 
129.
Charlotte
.146
0
6
.407
113
77.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.480
3
3
.480
72
 
130.
Massachusetts
.141
0
6
.396
120
78.
Arkansas
.477
2
3
.537
34
 
 

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's sixth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2017 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved