Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 
 

 

The Only Original and Unaltered
BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most to Date

LSU Is #1, Awaits Florida

  • Three of the top 4 teams are from the SEC, which is the top-rated conference
  • The Pac-10 is the #2 conference and has 5 teams in the top-25
  • #32 Washington has played by far the hardest schedule, with 4 games vs. the current top-15 and all 5 games vs. the current top-25
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 4

Final 2008-09 Rankings

2008 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
LSU
.848
5
0
.582
9
0-0
1-0
0
2.
Alabama
.830
5
0
.550
22
1-0
0-0
0
3.
Iowa
.816
5
0
.526
35
0-0
2-0
0
4.
Auburn
.801
5
0
.502
46
0-0
0-0
0
5.
Wisconsin
.801
5
0
.501
47
0-0
0-0
0
6.
Texas
.779
4
0
.469
73
0-0
0-0
0
7.
Florida
.773
4
0
.460
75
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Boise State
.772
5
0
.458
76
0-0
1-0
0
9.
Virginia Tech
.757
4
1
.594
4
1-1
0-0
0
10.
Miami, Fla.
.754
3
1
.623
3
0-1
1-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Cincinnati
.748
5
0
.426
97
  Southeastern
.658
25
3
.409
12. USC
.744
4
1
.578
10
  Pac-10
.640
19
8
.519
13. Stanford
.744
4
1
.577
12
  Big Ten
.600
25
9
.456
14. Kansas
.733
4
0
.407
112
  Big East
.580
23
7
.415
15. Notre Dame
.728
4
1
.557
19
  Big 12
.576
34
13
.439
16. TCU
.724
4
0
.396
113
  Atlantic Coast
.532
21
13
.461
17. Oregon
.720
4
1
.547
27
  Mountain West
.495
20
15
.452
18. Missouri
.718
4
0
.389
114
  WAC
.473
16
17
.482
19. Ohio State
.717
4
1
.544
29
  Conference USA
.429
17
18
.437
20. UCLA
.701
3
1
.558
18
  Sun Belt
.386
8
21
.522
21. Georgia Tech
.700
4
1
.524
38
  Mid-American
.368
13
31
.490
22. Arizona
.687
3
1
.541
30
  *non-conference play
23. Georgia
.685
3
2
.631
2
 
24. Penn State
.684
4
1
.505
42
 
25. Idaho
.683
4
1
.503
45
 
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
BYU
.676
4
1
.496
51
 
74.
Arizona State
.491
2
2
.491
56
27.
South Florida
.672
5
0
.339
120
 
75.
Texas Tech
.482
3
2
.422
99
28.
South Carolina
.659
4
1
.476
67
 
76.
Wyoming
.479
3
2
.419
101
29.
Michigan
.655
4
1
.472
70
 
77.
LA Monroe
.478
3
2
.419
103
30.
Nebraska
.654
3
1
.504
43
 
78.
Southern Miss
.476
3
2
.417
106
31.
Boston College
.653
4
1
.470
72
 
79.
Toledo
.473
3
2
.413
107
32.
Washington
.653
2
3
.705
1
 
80.
Northwestern
.471
3
2
.411
109
33.
West Virginia
.638
3
1
.487
58
 
81.
Syracuse
.465
2
3
.525
37
34.
Utah
.634
3
1
.483
63
 
82.
Central Florida
.440
3
2
.381
116
35.
Central Michigan
.622
4
1
.437
93
 
83.
Vanderbilt
.434
2
3
.494
53
36.
Baylor
.616
3
1
.463
74
 
84.
Fresno State
.434
1
3
.587
7
37.
Minnesota
.611
3
2
.552
21
 
85.
Maryland
.433
2
3
.493
54
38.
Pittsburgh
.609
4
1
.422
98
 
86.
SMU
.432
2
2
.432
95
39.
California
.604
3
2
.546
28
 
87.
San Diego State
.414
2
3
.474
68
40.
Connecticut
.603
3
1
.450
81
 
88.
Tulane
.412
2
2
.412
108
41.
Oklahoma State
.601
3
1
.448
82
 
89.
Illinois
.408
1
3
.561
17
42.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.592
3
1
.439
90
 
90.
Nevada
.396
1
3
.549
24
43.
Houston
.591
3
1
.438
92
 
91.
Washington State
.392
1
4
.578
11
44.
Wake Forest
.583
3
2
.523
39
 
92.
San Jose State
.386
1
3
.539
31
45.
Rutgers
.573
3
1
.419
102
 
93.
Hawaii
.386
2
2
.386
115
46.
Arkansas
.566
2
2
.566
15
 
94.
Kent State
.385
2
3
.444
85
47.
Mississippi
.564
3
1
.411
110
 
95.
Duke
.383
2
3
.442
86
48.
Navy
.563
3
2
.503
44
 
96.
Western Michigan
.380
2
3
.438
91
49.
Texas A&M
.560
3
1
.407
111
 
97.
UAB
.375
2
3
.433
94
50.
Oregon State
.560
3
2
.500
50
 
98.
Purdue
.365
1
4
.550
23
51.
Kentucky
.555
2
2
.555
20
 
99.
New Mexico State
.361
2
3
.418
104
52.
Northern Illinois
.547
3
2
.487
60
 
100.
UNLV
.360
2
3
.417
105
53.
North Carolina
.542
3
2
.482
65
 
101.
Temple
.358
2
2
.358
118
54.
Colorado State
.541
3
2
.481
66
 
102.
Arkansas State
.357
1
3
.507
41
55.
Indiana
.533
3
2
.473
69
 
103.
Bowling Green
.353
1
4
.537
32
56.
Mississippi State
.530
2
3
.590
5
 
104.
Colorado
.350
1
3
.501
48
57.
Tennessee
.529
2
3
.588
6
 
105.
Utah State
.346
1
3
.495
52
58.
Tulsa
.527
4
1
.344
119
 
106.
Akron
.342
1
3
.491
57
59.
Clemson
.526
2
3
.585
8
 
107.
North Texas
.338
1
3
.487
59
60.
LA Lafayette
.526
2
2
.526
36
 
108.
Louisville
.336
1
3
.484
62
61.
Marshall
.516
3
2
.455
77
 
109.
Virginia
.334
1
3
.483
64
62.
Ohio
.515
3
2
.455
78
 
110.
Army
.316
2
3
.370
117
63.
Oklahoma
.512
2
2
.512
40
 
111.
Buffalo
.308
1
4
.486
61
64.
N.C. State
.512
3
2
.451
80
 
112.
Memphis
.269
1
4
.439
89
65.
Florida State
.508
2
3
.568
13
 
113.
Fla. International
.233
0
4
.549
25
66.
Michigan State
.508
2
3
.568
14
 
114.
Miami, Ohio
.232
0
5
.548
26
67.
Kansas State
.506
3
2
.446
83
 
115.
Western Kentucky
.224
0
4
.536
33
68.
East Carolina
.506
3
2
.446
84
 
116.
Florida Atlantic
.220
0
4
.530
34
69.
UTEP
.501
2
3
.561
16
 
117.
Rice
.182
0
5
.472
71
70.
Air Force
.501
3
2
.441
87
 
118.
New Mexico
.172
0
5
.454
79
71.
Louisiana Tech
.501
2
2
.501
49
 
119.
Eastern Michigan
.158
0
4
.430
96
72.
Iowa State
.500
3
2
.440
88
 
120.
Ball State
.153
0
5
.420
100
73.
Troy
.492
2
2
.492
55
     

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2009 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved