Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most — to Date

Alabama Premiers Where It Left Off: at #1

  • Sixteen of the top-25 teams are from west of the Mississippi
  • The Big 12, whose very existence was apparently threatened in the off-season, is the top conference to date
  • The Mountain West is the 5th-best conference so far
  • Air Force cracks the top-25
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Oct. 3

Final 2009-10 Rankings


Final '09 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.828
5
0
.546
18
0-0
1-0
0
2.
LSU
.818
5
0
.528
27
0-0
0-0
0
3.
Oklahoma
.811
5
0
.517
32
0-0
1-0
0
4.
Arizona
.803
4
0
.505
38
0-0
1-0
0
5.
Kansas State
.802
4
0
.503
40
0-0
1-0
0
6.
Boise State
.801
4
0
.502
41
0-0
0-0
0
7.
TCU
.796
5
0
.494
44
0-0
0-0
0
8.
Auburn
.786
5
0
.479
51
0-0
1-0
0
9.
Missouri
.779
4
0
.468
62
0-0
0-0
0
10.
Oregon
.773
5
0
.459
68
0-0
1-0
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Oklahoma State
.768
4
0
.452
72
  Big 12
.668
35
6
.449
12. Michigan
.758
5
0
.439
83
  Southeastern
.629
24
5
.424
13. Florida
.753
4
1
.589
5
  Pac-10
.606
21
9
.485
14. Nevada
.750
5
0
.428
93
  Big Ten
.601
34
8
.408
15. Michigan State
.749
5
0
.428
95
  Mountain West
.513
15
16
.522
16. Ohio State
.748
5
0
.426
96
  Atlantic Coast
.506
22
13
.428
17. Nebraska
.733
4
0
.407
103
  Big East
.491
19
14
.446
18. Utah
.716
4
0
.386
114
  WAC
.484
19
17
.467
19. Northwestern
.713
5
0
.383
115
  Conference USA
.450
18
19
.458
20. Stanford
.708
4
1
.533
24
  Mid-American
.366
14
29
.469
21. Iowa
.689
4
1
.510
35
  Sun Belt
.279
4
22
.483
22. UCLA
.673
3
2
.618
2
  *non-conference play
23. Colorado
.667
3
1
.519
31
 
24. Air Force
.666
4
1
.484
48
 
25. South Carolina
.657
3
1
.508
36
 
RANK Team Rating Lose Lose Lose Lose Lose Lose Lose Lose Lose Lose Lose Lose
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
USC
.652
4
1
.468
61
 
74.
Utah State
.456
2
3
.516
33
27.
Florida State
.652
4
1
.468
63
 
75.
Army
.451
3
2
.392
110
28.
West Virginia
.643
3
1
.492
45
 
76.
Pittsburgh
.446
2
2
.446
78
29.
Texas
.639
3
2
.582
8
 
77.
Navy
.435
2
2
.435
84
30.
N.C. State
.638
4
1
.453
71
 
78.
Troy
.431
2
2
.431
90
31.
Temple
.621
4
1
.435
85
 
79.
Tulane
.431
2
2
.431
91
32.
Baylor
.620
4
1
.434
87
 
80.
Boston College
.424
2
2
.424
97
33.
Miami, Fla.
.618
3
1
.466
64
 
81.
Purdue
.422
2
2
.422
98
34.
Wisconsin
.614
4
1
.428
92
 
82.
Wake Forest
.420
2
3
.479
50
35.
Houston
.614
3
1
.461
67
 
83.
Virginia
.419
2
2
.419
99
36.
Arkansas
.609
3
1
.456
70
 
84.
BYU
.417
1
4
.603
3
37.
Penn State
.594
3
2
.535
22
 
85.
Arizona State
.416
2
3
.476
53
38.
San Diego State
.592
3
1
.439
82
 
86.
Louisville
.414
2
2
.414
101
39.
Southern Miss
.588
4
1
.401
107
 
87.
Colorado State
.414
1
4
.600
4
40.
Mississippi State
.587
3
2
.528
26
 
88.
Cincinnati
.399
1
3
.553
15
41.
Iowa State
.587
3
2
.527
29
 
89.
Kansas
.391
2
3
.450
75
42.
Oregon State
.584
2
2
.584
7
 
90.
Rutgers
.390
2
2
.390
112
43.
South Florida
.581
3
1
.428
94
 
91.
Buffalo
.387
2
3
.446
79
44.
Maryland
.578
4
1
.392
111
 
92.
Washington State
.386
1
4
.572
10
45.
Connecticut
.574
3
2
.514
34
 
93.
Georgia
.372
1
4
.558
14
46.
Fresno State
.564
3
1
.411
102
 
94.
Rice
.350
1
4
.533
23
47.
Miami, Ohio
.564
3
2
.504
39
 
95.
UNLV
.349
1
4
.532
25
48.
California
.561
2
2
.561
11
 
96.
Ohio
.348
2
3
.405
104
49.
Texas A&M
.558
3
1
.405
105
 
97.
Central Michigan
.346
2
3
.402
106
50.
Virginia Tech
.549
3
2
.489
47
 
98.
Marshall
.344
1
4
.528
28
51.
UTEP
.547
4
1
.362
117
 
99.
Western Michigan
.329
1
3
.476
52
52.
Washington
.544
2
2
.544
19
 
100.
LA Monroe
.325
1
3
.472
55
53.
North Carolina
.544
2
2
.544
20
 
101.
San Jose State
.319
1
4
.499
43
54.
Indiana
.543
3
1
.390
113
 
102.
Ball State
.318
2
3
.373
116
55.
Illinois
.537
2
2
.537
21
 
103.
UAB
.316
1
3
.462
66
56.
SMU
.532
3
2
.472
56
 
104.
LA Lafayette
.315
2
2
.315
118
57.
Mississippi
.531
3
2
.471
57
 
105.
Duke
.313
1
4
.491
46
58.
Toledo
.530
3
2
.470
59
 
106.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.310
2
2
.310
120
59.
Notre Dame
.529
2
3
.589
6
 
107.
Bowling Green
.305
1
4
.482
49
60.
Kentucky
.524
3
2
.464
65
 
108.
Florida Atlantic
.303
1
3
.447
77
61.
Texas Tech
.521
2
2
.521
30
 
109.
Louisiana Tech
.293
1
4
.469
60
62.
Tennessee
.513
2
3
.573
9
 
110.
Kent State
.292
1
3
.434
86
63.
Georgia Tech
.512
3
2
.452
74
 
111.
Memphis
.284
1
4
.458
69
64.
East Carolina
.507
2
2
.507
37
 
112.
Arkansas State
.279
1
4
.452
73
65.
Hawaii
.503
3
2
.443
81
 
113.
Minnesota
.273
1
4
.444
80
66.
Vanderbilt
.502
1
3
.651
1
 
114.
Western Kentucky
.242
0
4
.561
12
67.
Central Florida
.500
2
2
.500
42
 
115.
New Mexico
.240
0
5
.559
13
68.
Tulsa
.492
3
2
.432
88
 
116.
North Texas
.237
1
4
.397
109
69.
Idaho
.492
3
2
.432
89
 
117.
New Mexico State
.231
0
4
.547
17
70.
Wyoming
.487
2
3
.547
16
 
118.
Fla. International
.184
0
4
.475
54
71.
Clemson
.470
2
2
.470
58
 
119.
Eastern Michigan
.169
0
5
.448
76
72.
Northern Illinois
.459
3
2
.400
108
 
120.
Akron
.150
0
5
.414
100
73.
Syracuse
.457
3
1
.312
119
     

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2010 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved