Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 
 

 

The Only Original and Unaltered
BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have Accomplished the Most to Date

Alabama Is #1 for the 4th-Straight Week

  • Alabama, Utah, Texas, Oklahoma, and Texas Tech are the most accomplished teams so far this season
  • Undefeated Utah moves to #2, as the Utes are now a nation's best (tied with 1-loss Penn St.) 3-0 vs. the current top-25 — having beaten #13 TCU, #18 BYU, and #22 Oregon St.
  • The amazing Big 12 South holds down spots #3-5, with 3 teams that are collectively 3-3 against each other and 27-0 against everyone else
  • The BCS is a major reason why college football has by far the most meaningful regular season in all of sports, and Thanksgiving weekend features 3 more matchups of top-20 teams (all rivalry games): #4 Oklahoma at #14 Oklahoma St., #6 Florida at #19 Florida St., and #20 Georgia Tech at #9 Georgia
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Nov. 23

Nov. 16 Rankings
Nov. 9 Rankings
Nov. 2 Rankings
Oct. 26 Rankings
Oct. 19 Rankings
Oct. 12 Rankings
Oct. 5 Rankings
2007 Pre-Bowl Rankings
Final 2007-08 Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Alabama
.819
11
0
.530
42
1-0
0-0
0
2.
Utah
.805
12
0
.508
62
0-0
3-0
0
3.
Texas
.803
10
1
.582
2
1-1
2-0
0
4.
Oklahoma
.786
10
1
.556
18
1-1
3-0
0
5.
Texas Tech
.785
10
1
.555
19
1-1
2-0
0
6.
Florida
.783
10
1
.553
20
1-0
0-0
1
7.
Penn State
.765
11
1
.520
49
0-0
3-0
1
8.
Boise State
.764
11
0
.447
95
0-0
0-0
0
9.
Georgia
.751
9
2
.574
4
0-2
0-0
0
10.
USC
.747
9
1
.510
59
0-0
1-1
0
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Ohio State
.729
10
2
.535
37
  Big 12
.606
38
10
.426
12. Missouri
.718
9
2
.532
40
  Atlantic Coast
.600
34
10
.431
13. TCU
.707
10
2
.509
60
  Southeastern
.581
33
8
.392
14. Oklahoma State
.706
9
2
.518
54
  Big East
.573
26
12
.461
15. Cincinnati
.696
9
2
.505
66
  Big Ten
.566
31
12
.431
16. Ball State
.691
11
0
.358
119
  Mountain West
.523
25
11
.405
17. Michigan State
.687
9
3
.542
30
  Pac-10
.519
13
16
.550
18. BYU
.678
10
2
.475
79
  WAC
.458
17
18
.467
19. Florida State
.667
8
3
.533
39
  Mid-American
.432
22
29
.473
20. Georgia Tech
.656
8
3
.521
46
  Conference USA
.420
18
30
.495
21. Pittsburgh
.656
7
3
.539
35
  Sun Belt
.360
11
25
.475
22. Oregon State
.655
8
3
.521
47
  *non-conference play
23. Boston College
.654
8
3
.520
50
 
24. Northwestern
.644
9
3
.494
72
 
25. Nebraska
.642
7
4
.563
13
 
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26. North Carolina
.640
7
4
.561
14
  73. Louisville
.480
5
6
.507
63
27. South Carolina
.636
7
4
.557
16
  74. UNLV
.475
5
7
.526
44
28. Miami, Fla.
.636
7
4
.556
17
  75. Kansas State
.466
5
7
.516
56
29. Connecticut
.628
7
3
.509
61
  76. Purdue
.464
4
8
.565
11
30. Mississippi
.628
7
4
.548
26
  77. Stanford
.461
5
7
.511
58
31. Virginia Tech
.619
7
4
.539
36
  78. Texas A&M
.461
4
7
.543
29
32. West Virginia
.619
7
3
.498
71
  79. Mississippi State
.457
4
7
.540
33
33. Iowa
.616
8
4
.517
55
  80. San Jose State
.449
6
6
.449
94
34. California
.615
7
4
.535
38
  81. Northern Illinois
.448
6
5
.421
107
35. Oregon
.614
8
3
.476
78
  82. Arizona State
.442
4
6
.502
67
36. LSU
.613
7
4
.532
41
  83. New Mexico
.440
4
8
.541
31
37. Western Michigan
.610
9
2
.411
110
  84. UCLA
.440
4
6
.500
69
38. Wake Forest
.609
6
5
.583
1
  85. UTEP
.423
5
6
.450
93
39. Air Force
.606
8
4
.506
65
  86. Michigan
.419
3
9
.573
5
40. Central Michigan
.604
8
3
.466
82
  87. Bowling Green
.417
5
6
.444
97
41. Maryland
.600
7
4
.519
52
  88. Southern Miss
.416
5
6
.443
98
42. Vanderbilt
.595
6
5
.568
9
  89. Wyoming
.413
4
8
.513
57
43. Kansas
.577
6
5
.550
22
  90. Akron
.411
5
6
.437
101
44. Clemson
.571
6
5
.544
27
  91. Syracuse
.411
3
8
.550
24
45. Wisconsin
.570
7
5
.520
48
  92. Arkansas State
.407
5
5
.407
113
46. Tulsa
.568
9
2
.370
118
  93. Florida Atlantic
.398
5
6
.425
106
47. Kentucky
.567
6
5
.540
32
  94. Indiana
.391
3
9
.544
28
48. Navy
.559
6
4
.499
70
  95. Marshall
.385
4
7
.466
83
49. Rice
.555
8
3
.416
109
  96. Memphis
.384
5
6
.410
111
50. Rutgers
.552
6
5
.525
45
  97. Mid. Tenn. St.
.383
5
6
.409
112
51. South Florida
.551
6
4
.491
74
  98. Temple
.381
4
7
.461
85
52. Virginia
.545
5
6
.572
6
  99. Central Florida
.367
4
7
.446
96
53. Minnesota
.543
7
5
.493
73
  100. Fla. International
.363
4
6
.420
108
54. Buffalo
.542
7
4
.459
87
  101. LA Lafayette
.361
5
6
.387
117
55. Colorado State
.540
6
6
.540
34
  102. Utah State
.353
2
9
.549
25
56. Colorado
.537
5
6
.564
12
  103. New Mexico State
.340
3
8
.474
80
57. Notre Dame
.534
6
5
.507
64
  104. Ohio
.337
3
8
.471
81
58. East Carolina
.534
7
4
.451
92
  105. Toledo
.323
3
8
.455
89
59. N.C. State
.533
5
6
.560
15
  106. Iowa State
.323
2
10
.527
43
60. Fresno State
.523
7
4
.441
99
  107. San Diego State
.316
2
10
.519
51
61. Houston
.517
7
4
.435
103
  108. Army
.308
3
8
.438
100
62. Hawaii
.511
6
5
.484
75
  109. UAB
.305
3
8
.435
102
63. Nevada
.511
6
5
.484
76
  110. LA Monroe
.304
4
8
.396
116
64. Louisiana Tech
.511
7
4
.429
104
  111. Washington State
.301
2
10
.502
68
65. Illinois
.500
5
7
.550
23
  112. Kent State
.280
3
8
.406
115
66. Arkansas
.495
4
7
.577
3
  113. Tulane
.279
2
9
.464
84
67. Auburn
.491
5
6
.518
53
  114. Eastern Michigan
.271
2
9
.454
90
68. Baylor
.489
4
7
.571
7
  115. Miami, Ohio
.270
2
9
.453
91
69. Troy
.488
7
4
.406
114
  116. Idaho
.266
2
10
.458
88
70. Arizona
.487
6
5
.460
86
  117. SMU
.239
1
10
.480
77
71. Tennessee
.487
4
7
.569
8
  118. Washington
.234
0
11
.550
21
72. Duke
.483
4
7
.565
10
  119. North Texas
.202
1
10
.425
105

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Margin of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments on the field, not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2008 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved