Yellow Number 4 Brett Favre T-Shirt
 

One of the Original BCS Computer Rankings...

Showing Which Teams Have the Best Win-Loss Records Considering Their Schedules — to Date

One Week to Go

  • #1 Florida St. edges #2 Ohio St., while Auburn vaults to #3 after the Tigers' extraordinary win over Alabama
  • Among the top-10, these teams have the most wins versus the current top-25: Stanford, 5; Arizona St., 4; South Carolina, 3; Auburn and Oklahoma St., 2; all others, 1
  • The SEC's rating is .633 to the Pac-12's .632, while no other conference is within .047 of either of them
  • The BCS has once again produced the finest regular season in sports, which—after a phenomenal penultimate weekend—will culminate with a slew of top-25 matchups in the season's final week: #1 Florida St. vs. #24 Duke; #2 Ohio St. vs. #12 Michigan St.; #3 Auburn vs. #4 Missouri; #6 Arizona St. vs. #7 Stanford; #8 Oklahoma St. vs. #14 Oklahoma; and #9 Baylor vs. #22 Texas
More College
Football Links

The Jeff Anderson & Chris Hester
College Football Computer Rankings, as of Dec. 1

Nov. 24 Rankings
Nov. 17 Rankings
Nov. 10 Rankings
Nov. 3 Rankings
Oct. 27 Rankings
Oct. 20 Rankings
Oct. 13 Rankings
Oct. 6 Rankings
Sept. 29 Rankings

Final 2012-13 Rankings
Final '12 Pre-Bowl Rankings


 

Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched.
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
vs. Current
Top-10
vs. Current
#11-25
Other 
Losses
1.
Florida State
.807
12
0
.511
59
0-0
1-0
0
2.
Ohio State
.805
12
0
.507
61
0-0
1-0
0
3.
Auburn
.791
11
1
.557
31
1-0
1-1
0
4.
Missouri
.785
11
1
.549
37
0-1
1-0
0
5.
Alabama
.780
11
1
.542
40
0-1
1-0
0
6.
Arizona State
.778
10
2
.601
7
0-1
4-1
0
7.
Stanford
.777
10
2
.599
10
1-0
4-1
1
8.
Oklahoma State
.770
10
1
.533
50
1-0
1-0
1
9.
Baylor
.766
10
1
.528
51
0-1
1-0
0
10.
South Carolina
.760
10
2
.575
22
1-0
2-1
1
Rank Team 
Rating
 W 
 L 
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
Conference
Rankings
Rating
W*
 L*
Sched.
Strength*
11. Oregon
.755
10
2
.569
26
  Southeastern
.633
47
9
.421
12. Michigan State
.750
11
1
.500
63
  Pac-12
.632
31
6
.421
13. UCLA
.739
9
3
.604
6
  Big Ten
.584
37
11
.417
14. Oklahoma
.731
9
2
.549
36
  Atlantic Coast
.555
41
15
.413
15. Central Florida
.711
10
1
.456
80
  Big 12
.541
22
8
.398
16. Clemson
.708
10
2
.509
60
  American Athletic
.424
20
20
.424
17. USC
.703
9
4
.597
12
  Sun Belt
.410
19
21
.424
18. Northern Illinois
.696
12
0
.364
122
  Mountain West
.406
20
28
.455
19. Georgia
.692
8
4
.600
8
  Mid-American
.393
20
32
.461
20. LSU
.692
9
3
.548
38
  Conference USA
.377
20
36
.461
21. Wisconsin
.689
9
3
.544
39
  *non-conference play
22. Texas
.687
8
3
.557
32
 
23. Washington
.684
8
4
.591
14
 
24. Duke
.683
10
2
.480
66
 
25. Notre Dame
.677
8
4
.583
18
 
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength BCS Football Rankings RANK Team Rating Win Lose Schedule Strength Schedule Strength
Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
  Rank Team 
Rating
W
L
Sched. 
Strength
Sched. 
Rank
26.
Texas A&M
.667
8
4
.572
24
 
76.
Colorado
.466
4
8
.567
28
27.
Miami, Fla.
.660
9
3
.511
58
 
77.
UNLV
.464
7
5
.415
98
28.
Louisville
.653
10
1
.391
112
 
78.
San Diego State
.463
7
5
.413
99
29.
Iowa
.647
8
4
.550
34
 
79.
Tulane
.461
7
5
.412
102
30.
Mississippi
.639
7
5
.591
13
 
80.
San Jose State
.458
6
6
.458
78
31.
Minnesota
.638
8
4
.540
42
 
81.
Troy
.453
6
6
.453
83
32.
Arizona
.636
7
5
.589
15
 
82.
Illinois
.448
4
8
.549
35
33.
Virginia Tech
.636
8
4
.538
45
 
83.
West Virginia
.438
4
8
.539
43
34.
Michigan
.631
7
5
.583
17
 
84.
Florida Atlantic
.437
6
6
.437
90
35.
BYU
.624
8
4
.525
53
 
85.
Wake Forest
.432
4
8
.533
49
36.
Fresno State
.624
10
1
.362
123
 
86.
Rutgers
.431
5
6
.458
77
37.
Vanderbilt
.622
8
4
.523
54
 
87.
Ohio
.430
7
5
.382
117
38.
Nebraska
.616
8
4
.517
55
 
88.
Arkansas
.427
3
9
.581
20
39.
Washington State
.611
6
6
.611
3
 
89.
SMU
.423
5
6
.450
85
40.
Penn State
.608
7
5
.559
29
 
90.
Iowa State
.414
3
9
.568
27
41.
Mississippi State
.599
6
6
.599
9
 
91.
Akron
.406
5
7
.455
82
42.
Texas Tech
.588
7
5
.539
44
 
92.
Kansas
.400
3
9
.554
33
43.
Georgia Tech
.585
7
5
.535
46
 
93.
Colorado State
.400
7
6
.378
118
44.
Kansas State
.584
7
5
.535
47
 
94.
South Alabama
.396
5
6
.422
95
45.
Utah
.579
5
7
.627
2
 
95.
Texas State
.391
6
6
.391
111
46.
Houston
.575
8
4
.474
68
 
96.
Central Michigan
.389
6
6
.389
113
47.
Oregon State
.570
6
6
.570
25
 
97.
Virginia
.374
2
10
.582
19
48.
Ball State
.568
10
2
.360
124
 
98.
Nevada
.372
4
8
.470
70
49.
Rice
.566
9
3
.412
101
 
99.
Kentucky
.372
2
10
.580
21
50.
Cincinnati
.564
9
2
.366
120
 
100.
California
.369
1
11
.637
1
51.
Tennessee
.560
5
7
.608
5
 
101.
N.C. State
.362
3
9
.513
57
52.
Boston College
.554
7
5
.504
62
 
102.
Memphis
.357
3
8
.493
64
53.
LA Lafayette
.545
8
3
.406
107
 
103.
Kent State
.344
4
8
.440
89
54.
Pittsburgh
.541
6
6
.541
41
 
104.
Purdue
.343
1
11
.610
4
55.
Navy
.539
7
4
.456
79
 
105.
Wyoming
.340
5
7
.387
114
56.
East Carolina
.537
9
3
.384
115
 
106.
South Florida
.323
2
9
.516
56
57.
Indiana
.535
5
7
.584
16
 
107.
Tulsa
.316
3
9
.462
74
58.
North Carolina
.534
6
6
.534
48
 
108.
Connecticut
.292
2
9
.479
67
59.
Bowling Green
.529
9
3
.377
119
 
109.
New Mexico
.277
3
9
.416
96
60.
Syracuse
.528
6
6
.528
52
 
110.
New Mexico State
.275
2
10
.469
71
61.
Maryland
.523
7
5
.473
69
 
111.
Army
.273
3
8
.396
109
62.
Utah State
.516
8
4
.415
97
 
112.
Louisiana Tech
.267
4
8
.354
125
63.
Marshall
.515
9
3
.364
121
 
113.
Temple
.267
2
10
.459
76
64.
Western Kentucky
.510
8
4
.410
104
 
114.
UAB
.257
2
10
.447
86
65.
North Texas
.510
8
4
.410
105
 
115.
Eastern Michigan
.249
2
10
.437
91
66.
Northwestern
.508
5
7
.558
30
 
116.
Idaho
.241
1
11
.488
65
67.
Boise State
.505
8
4
.405
108
 
117.
Air Force
.231
2
10
.412
103
68.
Toledo
.505
7
5
.455
81
 
118.
UTEP
.228
2
10
.407
106
69.
Arkansas State
.501
7
5
.451
84
 
119.
Hawaii
.227
1
11
.469
72
70.
Florida
.498
4
8
.598
11
 
120.
Western Michigan
.222
1
11
.461
75
71.
UTSA
.497
7
5
.447
87
 
121.
Massachusetts
.211
1
11
.445
88
72.
Buffalo
.494
8
4
.394
110
 
122.
Southern Miss
.198
1
11
.426
94
73.
Mid. Tenn. St.
.481
8
4
.382
116
 
123.
Fla. International
.190
1
11
.412
100
74.
TCU
.472
4
8
.573
23
 
124.
Miami, Ohio
.160
0
12
.433
92
75.
LA Monroe
.468
6
6
.468
73
 
125.
Georgia State
.158
0
12
.429
93

 
The Anderson & Hester Rankings are distinct in four ways: 

1. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not reward teams for running up scores.  Teams are rewarded for beating quality opponents, which is the object of the game.  Posting large margins of victory, which is not the object of the game, is not considered. 

2. Unlike the polls, these rankings do not prejudge teams.  These rankings first appear after the season's fifth week, and each team's ranking reflects its actual accomplishments — on the field, to date — not its perceived potential. 

3. These rankings compute the most accurate strength of schedule ratings.  Each team's opponents and opponents' opponents are judged not only by their won-lost records but also, uniquely, by their conferences' strength (see #4). 

4. These rankings provide the most accurate conference ratings.  Each conference is rated according to its non-conference won-lost record and the difficulty of its non-conference schedule. 


Contact AndersonSports

 Copyright 2013 by AndersonSports, all rights reserved